Book Title: Jaina Theories of Reality and Knowledge
Author(s): Y J Padmarajiah
Publisher: Jain Sahitya Vikas Mandal

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 259
________________ 240 JAINA THEORIES OF REALITY AND KNOWLEDGE later' Naiyāyikas, the oneness (ekatva), and the eternality (nityatva) of samavāya, for manyness (anekatva) and transcience (anityatva). Consequently, with the admission of manyness what was conceived as all-pervasive (vyāpaka) became something which is restricted to individual objects. This triple change in the conception of samavāya has been actuated by the compelling force of the opponent schools like the Buddhists, the Vedāntins, the Mīmāṁsakas and the Jainas. The Jaina does not concede the occurrence of the 'ihapratyaya' or ihabuddhi (“in-ness')-.g., the linen is in the yarns (iha tantușu pațah) --which is held by the samavāyah, na jale ityādi pratiteh samavāyasya nänātvam iti navyāḥ / BPVK, p. 113.) Also see NNLI, f.n. 162, p. 75, and f.n. 165, p. 76. "The later Naiyāyikas and the Mimāṁsakas following Prabhākara refuse to view samavāya either as eternal or one." IPC, 1927, p. 162, f.n. 3. (The references indicate the Prabhākara view of samavāya : samavāyo nānā nityaś ceti Prabhākarah, U on VD, p. 353, also see thereon.) "Samavāya, Inherence, cannot be regarded as everlasting, because it is actually found to be ephemeral; for instance, the Inherence between the Community and the Individual comes into existence when the Individual is produced, and perishes as soon as that Individual perishes." PMS, p. 63. See also, ibid., p. 93, where "Eternal contact” is regarded as a contradiction in terms, Dhruva maintains that the "earlier logicians" could not accept a plurality of samavāyas since they feared that the quality of number would be associated with it. See Notes, SM, p. 81. But it is difficult to see how they could avoid accepting even "one" as a number, 1. For the statement of the early Naiyāyikas on the oneness, the eternality and all-pervasiveness of samavāya, see supra, p. 209 and the footnotes thereon. 2. Abhayadeva describes this as a fancy induced by the bias towards one's own system: svasamayahitavāsanāprakalpita iva. TBV, p. 700 ff. Cf. tadeha ihavijñānaṁ pareşām eva vartate, svasiddhäntánurāgena nädartum lau kikam tu tat / TSS, kā. 827. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444