Book Title: Jaina Gazette 1927
Author(s): J L Jaini, Ajitprasad
Publisher: Jaina Gazettee Office

Previous | Next

Page 33
________________ 18 THE JAINA GAZETTE the Jain church in the centuries immediately following Lord Mahavira's Nirvana, none of them was so strong as to break the integrity of the community. The Digambara and Svetambara split, however, was a very marked one. As the spread of Buddhism divided the faith into Hinayana and Mahayana forms, even so was the case with Jainism. The beginning of it goes back to the time of Bhadrabahu. The part of the community that migrated to the south being afterwards called Digambaras while those that stayed in the north were called Svetambaras. Tradition places the actual division in the 2nd century A.D., but the probability is that it took place about the 4th century A.D. • The growth of sectional religious literatures was the marked characteristic of the period. Mahavira had preached not in Sanskrit, the language of Shistas' but in Prakrit, the dialect of the masses, which hence-forth became a literary language of the Jains even as Pali of the Buddhas. Though the Lord's teachings were systematised and arranged in the twelve Angas ever in His lifetime, they were not reduced to writing but preserved orally. Hence the knowledge of them declined during the following centuries and the Angas were gradually lost. In the fifth century the northern section of the community, the Svelambaras, strived to recover the lost books, and the great council of Valabhi held in A.D. 453 under Devardhi Gani succeeded in collecting eleven Angas. These were however, rejected by the Digambaras as not genuine. After this the Svetambaras applied themselves to the study of their newly collected Angas, while the Digambaras produced original Prakrit works on Jain philosophy. Two of their greatest authors Kundakundacharya and Umasvati are known to have flourished in the first century B.C. The Syadvada system of dialectics was much studied during this period as it was of great help in religious discussions with the Buddhas, that became so frequent in this period. The greatest Jain logicians Samantabhadra and Akalanka, who badly discomfitured the Bauddhas in religious disputations, lived in this period The inability of the latter to meet the argumentative onsloughts of the former, seems to have been partly the reason of their decline in India henceforth, Shree Sudharmaswami Gyanbhandar-Umara, Surat www.umaragyanbhandar.com

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 ... 568