Jain Journal 1992 07

Author(s): Jain Bhawan Publication
Publisher: Jain Bhawan Publication

Page 23

18
cakkal.179 34, chattal. 35, damḍal. 36, asil. 37, manil. 38, kāganil. 39, cammal.180 40, camdayal. 41, suracariyam 42, rahucariyaṁ 43, gahacariyam181 44, sobhakaram 45, dobhakaram 46, vijjāgayaṁ 47, mamtag. 48, rahassag. 49, sambhavam 50, vāram (? caram BC) 51, paḍivāram (cāraṁ BC)182 52, būham 53, paḍibuhaṁ 54, khaṁdhāvāramāṇaṁ 55, nagaramāṇaṁ 56, vatthumāṇam 57, khaṁdhāvāranivesaṁ 58, nagaraṇivesam 59, vatthunivesam 60, isattham 61, charuppavayam (pagayam BC) 62, asasikkham 63, hatthisikkham 64, dhanuvedam 65, hariṇavādam (hiraṇṇavāyaṁ BC) 66, suvanṇavādam 67, manipagam 68, dhäupāgam 69, bahujuddham 70, damḍaj. 71, muṭṭhij. 72, aṭṭhij. 73, juddham 74, nijuddham 75, juddhātijuddham 76, suttakheddam 77, naliyakheḍḍam 78, vaṭṭakheddam 79, dhammakheddam183 80, camharevaṭṭam (pamhakheḍdam BC) 81, pattacheyyam 82, kaḍaga (kannaga BC) cheyyam 83, pattagacheyyam 84, sajīvam 85, nijivam 86, saüṇaruyam 87, iti. Of these 87 names, 15 are to be removed, whether they are paṭhämtaras (see on No. 80), or interpolations. For the v. r. from Nay. see below ;-§ 81 Vivahapannattie (in the fifth anga) ekkāsim mahājummasaya [284], (mahāyugmasatāni) paṁ (natta) ;-§ 84 vivahapannattie nam bhagavaie cauräsiim payasahassa padaggeṇam pannattă. Later on in the course of our investigation we will recur to the fact that this statement in reference to the extent of the text is less by 100,000 padas than that of the present text. See § 85 and § 25 on the designation as bhagavati, which has remained the exclusive property of this text. § 85 āyārassa nam bhagavato saculiyāgassa paṁcaśiim uddesaṇakālā; -§ 88 diṭṭhivayassa nam aṭṭhāsiiṁ suttiim paṁ tam; ujjusuyaṁ, pariṇayaparinayam, evam aṭṭhāsiim suttani bhaiyavväni, jaha Namdie.' This reference to the Nandi, by which any further enumeration has been spared, is very remarkable from the fact that the statements in it, a few pages further on, are found in exactly the same detail in the fourth anga itself at this very point, in the consideration of the contents and extent of all the angas. This being the case the reference ought to have followed the collective statement found several pages further on in the same anga. We are therefore compelled to believe that the Nandi is the original source of information for this presentation, common to anga 4 and the Nandi, and that this presentation was
JAIN JOURNAL
179 Näy. omits 33,34.
180 40-50 omitted in Nay.
181 Are they to be regarded as planets or are they to be understood according to the fashion of the Ath. Paris. 53.54 ?
182 Instead of 51-57 there are in Nay, the following 31 names; vatthuvijjam, khamdharamānam 56, 53. 54, 51 (BC), 52 (BC) cakkavuham; garulavuham; sagaḍavuham; 74-76, 73 72, 70, layajuddham; 61, 62, 65-67.77.79.78.81.82.85-87.
183 Omitted in BC, where we read instead pāvamtare (pāṭhāmtare) camha, by which camha is manifestly designated as v. 1. to pamha.