Book Title: Grihya Sutras
Author(s): Hermann Oldenberg
Publisher: Oxford

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 23
________________ I ADHYAYA, I KHANDA, 8. 13 4. Some declare (that the domestic fire should be kindled) at the time of the division of the inheritance. 5. Or that after the death of the householder the eldest one himself (should kindle it). 6. (It should be kindled) on the day of the new moon of the month of Vaisakha or on another (new moon day). 7. Some say (that the fire should be kindled) according to the (sacrificer's) wishes under the (corresponding) constellation. 8. He should light his fire at one of the following places, viz. in the house of a Vaisya who is rich in 5. Nârâyana : 'If the fire has not been kindled at the time stated above, then, after the householder ... i.e. the father, even if he should not have performed the âdhâna, or the elder brother has died, the eldest son (or the son who after his elder brother's death has become the eldest), after he has performed the Sapindikarana (for the dead father or brother; see below, IV, 3, and the ninth chapter of the Parisishta book V1), even if he has not divided the inheritance with his younger brothers (so that the time stated in the fourth Sätra would not have arrived), should kindle the fire himself, i.e. without an officiating priest (ritvig). ... Or the Sätra should be divided into two; prete vâ grihapatau (or after the death of the householder), and svayam gyâyân (the eminent one himself), i.e. of Brahmanas, Kshatriyas, and Vaisyas a gyâyâ n, which means a most eminent person, a Brahmana, performs the Påkayagñas himself; for the two other castes the Pâkayagñas have to be performed through an officiating priest : this is the meaning of this svayam (himself). I have given this note of Narayana as a specimen of the entirely arbitrary and obviously misleading explanations which are unfortunately so frequently found in this author, as indeed in most of the other Sätra commentators. As to the true meaning of this svayam I still adhere to the explanation which I proposed in my German edition of the text (p. 118), that in case no division of the inheritance takes place, the sacred fire should be kindled on behalf of all the joint-proprietors, but that only the eldest brother should act personally (svayam). 8. Or, 'at (the fire of) a person rich in cattle, in the house of a Vaisya,' &c.? The commentators (see p. 118 of the German Digitized by Google

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 ... 2642