Book Title: Ganitasara Sangraha
Author(s): Mahaviracharya, M Rangacharya
Publisher: Government of Madras

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 402
________________ Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra www.kobatirth.org Acharya Shri Kailassagarsuri Gyanmandir CHAPTER VII-MEASUREMENT OF AREAS. 205 of those two (other) figures which resemble (the longitudinal section of) the Panava, and (of) the Vajra, that (same resulting area, which is obtained by multiplying the maximum length with the measure of the breadth of the mouth), is diminished by the measure of the areas of the associated bow-shaped figures. (The remainder gives the requird measure of the area concerned.) Examples in illustration thereof. 771. In the case of a figure having the outline configuration of a Mrdanga, the (maximum) length is 24; the breadth of each of) the two mouths is 8; and the (maximum) breadth in the middle is 16. What is the area ? 787. In the case of a figure having the outline of a Panava, the (maximum.) length is 24 ; similarly the measure of the breadth of either of the two mouths is 8; and the central breadth is 4. What is the area ? 791. In the case of a figure having the outline of a Vajra, the (maximum) length is 24; the measure (of the breadth of either) of the two mouths is 8; and the centre is a point. Give out as before what the area is. The rule for arriving at the minutely accurate value of the areas of figures resembling (the annulus making up) the rim of a wheel, (resembling) the crescent moon and the (longitudinal) section of the tusk of an elephant : 801. In the case of (a circular annulus resembling) the rim of a wheel, the sum of the measures of the inner and the outer curves is divided by 6, multiplied by the measure of the breadth 803. The rule here given for the area of an annulus, if expressed algebraically, comes to be 41 2 * p * v 10, where a, and a, are the measures of the two circumferences, and p is the measure of the breadth of the annulus. On & comparison of this value of the area of the annulus with the approximate value of the same as given in stanza 7 above (vide note thereunder), it will be evident that the formula here does not give the accurate value, the value mentioned in the rule in stanza 7 being itself the accurate value. The mistake seems to have arisen from & wrong notion that in the determination of the value of this area, * is involved even otherwise than in the values of ai and ago anze 7 does not give them note thereunder, For Private and Personal Use Only

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523