Book Title: Comprehensive History of Jainism Volume II
Author(s): Aseem Kumar Chaterjee
Publisher: Firma KLM Pvt Ltd

Previous | Next

Page 180
________________ 170 COMPREHENSIVB HISTORY OF JAINISM As we have already seen, a large number of towns of this region, were associated from very early times, with the Jain religion. Several Jain centres like Satyapura (Sanchor), Jāvālipura (Jalor), Jaisalmer, Abu were associated with Jainism, even before 1300 A.D. Both Satyapura and Jāvālipura, the two famous Jain centres, as we will shortly see, were destroyed by the perfidious Muslims in the early 14th century. Let us now turn our attention to Jaisalmer, which still continues as a Jain centre of pilgrimage. The association of Jainism with Jaisalmer goes back to V.S. 1244, when in the spiritual reign of Jinapati of the Kharatara gaccha, the sangha of Jesalameru (the old name of Jaisalmer), participated in the pilgrimage, organised by that saint.118 The earliest temple of this place, viz. that dedicated to Pārsvanātha, was constructed by Jagaddhara, son of Kshemandhara, before 1218 A.D.114 This temple of Pārsvanātha is mentioned in connexion with Kharatara Jineśvara's visit to this place in V.S. 1323.116 Jinaprabodha116, of that gaccha visited Jesalmeru in V.S. 1340, and he was given a very warm welcome by Karṇadeva, the king of Jesalameru. Jinacandra III of the same gaccha visited this place in V.S. 1356 and stayed there till V.S. 1338. The then king of Jesalmeru viz., rajadhirāja Jaitra. simha, who was a great patron of Jainism, gave him a rousing welcome and new icons were installed by Jinacandra III in the Påráva temple in V.S. 1358, corresponding to 1300 A.D.117 His successor Jinakusala paid a visit to this temple118 in V.S. 1383. And Jinapadma, the successor of Jinakušala, also visited the temple11° in V.S. 1390. It, therefore, appears that the temple of Pārsvanātha of Jaisalmer, was the only Jina temple of that place, for a very long time. During the rule of Lakshmana in the early 15th century, this temple was repaired. P. C. Nahar is obviously wrong 120, when he claims that it was during Lakshmaṇa's reign, that the temple was first built. It appears that as a result of Ala-Ud-din's raid, this temple

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414