Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Verse 170: Explanation of the Six Substances and Five Categories
**Verse 3:**
With respect to (the category of) **Aṇaiṇihaṇā** (non-destruction), they are **anādi** (beginningless) and **ananta** (infinite). With respect to (the category of) **sānta** (finite), they are **sānta** (finite) and **ananta** (infinite). In this way, they are **pañcaggaguṇappadhānā** (possessors of five types of virtues) and **sattapākī** (possessors of two types of powers).
**Explanation:**
These living beings are pure **chaitanyarūpa** (consciousness) in nature, according to the **śuddha dravyārthika** (pure substance-based) **naya** (perspective), which perceives them as possessing pure **pāriṇāmika** (transformational) **paramabhāva** (ultimate state). Therefore, they are **anādi** (beginningless) and **ananta** (infinite), meaning that their **pāriṇāmika** (transformational) state always exists. With respect to the **audhayika** (active), **kṣayopśamika** (subduing), and **aupaśamika** (subdued) states, they are **sānta** (finite). These three states arise and cease due to the **udaya** (arising), **upaśama** (subduing), or **kṣayopśama** (subduing and destruction) of **karma** (karmic actions). With respect to the **kṣayika** (destroyed) states, they are **sānta** (finite) and **ananta** (infinite). The **kṣayika** (destroyed) states should not be considered **sādisānta** (finite and beginningless), because they arise from the destruction of **karma** (karmic actions) in the form of **kevala jñāna** (perfect knowledge) and other qualities, and they remain forever. These states are the natural states of a living being, similar to those of a **siddhājīva** (liberated soul), and nature is never destroyed. Although these living beings are pure by nature, due to their **karmabandha** (bondage to karma) from **anādikāla** (beginningless time), they are seen to transform into **audhayika** (active) and other states, like water mixed with mud. This is how their nature is explained.
Now, regarding the number, it is said that these living beings are **ananta** (infinite) in number, based on the **dravyasvabhāva** (nature of substance). This means that their number is **akṣaya ananta** (infinite and indestructible).
The word **sānta ananta** (finite and infinite) has another explanation: those living beings whose **samsāra** (cycle of birth and death) can end are **sānta** (finite), meaning they are **bhavyas** (those who can attain liberation). Those whose **samsāra** (cycle of birth and death) cannot end are **ananta** (infinite), meaning they are **abhavya** (those who cannot attain liberation). These **abhavya** (those who cannot attain liberation) living beings are **ananta** (infinite) in number. Among them, there are **anantaguṇe** (infinitely more) **bhavyas** (those who can attain liberation). Among these **bhavyas** (those who can attain liberation), there are **anantaguṇe** (infinitely more) **abhavya** (those who cannot attain liberation) who are similar to **bhavyas** (those who can attain liberation) and whose **samsāra** (cycle of birth and death) will never end.
The meaning of this verse is that those **bhavyas** (those who can attain liberation) who are **sādisānta** (finite and beginningless) and who transform by abandoning **mithyātva** (falsehood), **rāga** (attachment), and other **doṣas** (faults), are capable of being **guṇita** (transformed) by the **anādi ananta** (beginningless and infinite) **anantajñāna** (infinite knowledge) and other qualities of the pure living beings.
## Verse 54: Explanation of Time
**Verse 54:**
This is the resolution of the contradiction regarding the **sādisaniḍhanatva** (finite and beginningless) and **sādyaniḍhanatva** (finite and ending) of the living being's state.
**The Jinas have said:**
"The destruction of the **sat** (real) is the birth of the **asat** (unreal) for the living being."
This is a statement that is both **anyonyaviruḍdha** (contradictory) and **aviruḍdha** (non-contradictory).
**Explanation:**
The Jinas have said that the destruction of the **sat** (real) is the birth of the **asat** (unreal) for the living being. This statement appears contradictory because it seems to imply that the **sat** (real) can be destroyed and the **asat** (unreal) can be born. However, it is also non-contradictory because it is referring to the **pāriṇāmika** (transformational) states of the living being, which are constantly changing. The **sat** (real) state is the **pāriṇāmika** (transformational) state of the living being that is **anādi** (beginningless) and **ananta** (infinite). The **asat** (unreal) state is the **pāriṇāmika** (transformational) state of the living being that is **sānta** (finite) and **anādi** (beginningless). The destruction of the **sat** (real) state is the cessation of the **pāriṇāmika** (transformational) state that is **anādi** (beginningless) and **ananta** (infinite). The birth of the **asat** (unreal) state is the arising of the **pāriṇāmika** (transformational) state that is **sānta** (finite) and **anādi** (beginningless). Therefore, the statement is both **anyonyaviruḍdha** (contradictory) and **aviruḍdha** (non-contradictory) because it is referring to the **pāriṇāmika** (transformational) states of the living being, which are constantly changing.