Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Translation:
**186**
From the *Sāsādan* to the *Apūrvakaraṇa* *guṇasthāna*, the bondage of a state less than the *Antahkoḍakoḍī Sāgara* does not occur, nor does it occur more than that. In other words, from the second to the eighth *guṇasthāna*, the *Antahkoḍakoḍī Sāgara* is the standard state of bondage, neither less nor more.
**Commentator**
There is a question here: When beings like *Ekaindriya* are in the *Sāsādan* *guṇasthāna*, they have the bondage of a state like *Sāgara* etc. Therefore, the statement that in the *Sāsādan* etc. *guṇasthānas*, there is no bondage of a state less than the *Antahkoḍakoḍī Sāgara*, does not seem appropriate.
**1**
This doubt is not appropriate, because such events are *kādaचित्क*, which are not being discussed here. Here, *Ekaindriya* etc. are not being discussed, but rather the *saṁjñī pañcendriya* (five-sensed beings with consciousness). Therefore, the *saṁjñī pañcendriya* does not experience bondage of a state less than the *Antahkoḍakoḍī Sāgara* from the *Sāsādan* to the *Apūrvakaraṇa*.
It has been stated that from the *Sāsādan* to the *Apūrvakaraṇa* *guṇasthāna*, there is no bondage of a state less than the *Antahkoḍakoḍī Sāgara*. There is a question here: Is there any *mithyādr̥ṣṭi* (false-sighted) being who does not experience bondage of a state less than the *Antahkoḍakoḍī Sāgara*? In response to this, the verse states that both the *bhavya saṁjñī mithyādr̥ṣṭi* (noble conscious false-sighted) and the *abhavya saṁjñī mithyādr̥ṣṭi* (ignoble conscious false-sighted) do not experience bondage of a state less than the *Antahkoḍakoḍī Sāgara*. The qualifier *mithyādr̥ṣṭi* with *bhavya saṁjñī* implies that the *bhavya saṁjñī* also experiences inferior bondage in the *anivṛttibāda* etc. *guṇasthānas*. The qualifier *saṁjñī* implies that the *bhavya asaṁjñī* (noble unconscious) experiences bondage of a state less than the *Antahkoḍakoḍī Sāgara*. As for the *abhavya saṁjñī*,...
**Footnote:**
1. "This is true, but it is only *kādaचित्क*, not universal. Therefore, it is not being discussed here." - *Pañcama Karmapraśtha Svopājña Ṭīkā*