Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## 80
## Century
The arising of the **Jiva** is considered **Jiva-vipaki**, not **Pudgala-vipaki**.
Similarly, **Kshayas** like anger, etc., should also be understood as **Jiva-vipaki**. Just as anger, etc., arises upon hearing words of contempt, which are **Pudgalik**, in the same way, they also arise through **Smriti**, etc., without any connection to **Pudgalas**. Therefore, **Kshayas** like anger, etc., are not **Pudgala-vipaki** but **Jiva-vipaki**.
## Explanation related to **Gati** Karma
**Gati** Karma is **Jiva-vipaki**. The **Jijasa** asks: Just as **Ayukarma** binds the lifespan of a particular **Bhava**, and arises only in that **Bhava**, not elsewhere, similarly, **Gati** Karma also arises in its own **Bhava**. It does not arise in any other **Bhava** besides its own. Therefore, it is reasonable to consider **Gati** Karma as **Bhava-vipaki**, just like **Ayukarma**.
The answer is that there is a difference in the **Vipaka** of **Ayukarma** and **Gati** Karma. Because **Ayukarma**, except for the **Bhava** whose lifespan it binds, does not arise in any other **Bhava** through **Vipaka-udaya**. It also does not arise through **Sthibhuka-samkrama**. For example, the lifespan of a human arises only in the human **Bhava**, not in any other **Bhava**. Therefore, **Ayukarma** is considered **Bhava-vipaki** because it is inseparable from its own designated **Bhava** for its arising. This means that after the binding of **Ayukarma** suitable for any **Bhava**, the **Jiva** must be born in that **Bhava**. However, this is not the case with the arising of **Gati** Karma. Because, even without its own **Bhava**, it can arise in another **Bhava** through **Sthibhuka-samkrama**.