Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## The Fifth Karma Granth
The answer is that the bondage and arising of Mithyatva occurs in the first Gunasthan of Mithyatva, but there is no arising or bondage of Misra Mohaniya and Samyaktava Mohaniya. If these two natures were to remain in the Mithyatva Gunasthan and prevent the arising of Mithyatva while themselves arising, then they could certainly be called antagonistic. But their place of arising is different, meaning Misra Mohaniya arises in the third Gunasthan, Samyaktava Mohaniya arises in the fourth Gunasthan, and Mithyatva arises in the first Gunasthan. Therefore, they do not oppose each other's bondage or arising while residing in the same Gunasthan. This is why Mithyatva is considered Aparaavartaman. Similarly, one should understand about other natures that their bondage, place of arising, or place of bondage and arising is different.
Now, in the following verse, we will explain the Paraavartaman and Kshetravipako natures.
## Paraavartaman and Kshetravipaki Natures
**Tanuattu Bey Vujuyal Kasay Ujjoygoyduag Nidda. Tasakosaau Parisaa Khitarsivaaga'anupuschoo.** ||16||
**Word Meaning:**
* Tanu Bhat - Thirty-three natures of the eight bodies
* Bey - Three Vedas
* Vujuyal - Two Yugals
* Kaptaap - Sixteen Kapayas
* Ujjoygoyduag - Udyotik, Gotravik, Vedaniya Dwik
* Miha - Five Nidrames
* Tasbees - Tasveeshak
* Pau - Four Ayus
* Parittaaparaavartaman - Paraavartaman
* Khitarsivaaga - Kshetravipako
* Maanupushveeoo - Four Anupurchas