Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Karma Nath Part Four
**144**
**1.** A non-sentient being is considered to be in one *guna-sthana* according to the principles. From what perspective? Provide evidence. (Page 7, Note)
**2.** What is the intention of those who consider two *guna-sthana* in the *maha-ma-nik* and those who consider three *guna-sthana*? Explain. (Page 12)
**3.** Six *guna-sthana* are considered in this *karma-prampa* for the three *ashum leshya* of *kama*, *adi*, and *leshya*. However, four *guna-sthana* are considered in *pan-sangrah* and other texts for the same three *leshya*. From what perspective? Provide evidence. (Page 88)
**4.** It is said that eleven *guna-sthana* are found at the time of death. How are only three *guna-sthana* considered in all *vigrah-gati*? Explain. (Page 86)
**5.** In *strovev*, there are thirteen *yoga*. In *vev-samanya*, there are *bagch* uses and nine *guna-sthana*. Which type of field, from *soy* or *bhav*, is considered to account for this difference? Explain. (Page 67, Note)
**6.** In the *yoga* of *jap-a-sampavarav*, there is a consideration of *bhivar-ik-mishra-yoga*. How is this possible? Explain. (Page 6)
**7.** The concept of *shri-alpa-bahutva* in *margana* is mentioned in the *karma-granth*. Is this concept found in ancient texts or in later texts? Provide information. (Page 15, Note)
**8.** Provide a well-supported statement about the subtlety of the field in relation to time. (Page 177, Note)
**9.** Explain the meaning of *shulk*, *pan*, and *temo-leshya-vala* in relation to the number of *guna*, *alpa-yatya*, *shas-samadhan*, and the relevant commentary. (Page 130, Note)
**10.** Clearly explain the nature of the *seen yoga*, their internal causes, and the resolution of doubts regarding the number of *yoga*. Also, explain the nature of *dravya-mam*, *pra-dhyapan*, and *sharira*. (Page 134)