Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Samgranth Part Four
**Page 16:**
The detailed description of the *Adi Sanjnas* is present, but not in the Digambar tradition.
**Page 41:**
The term *Nitya Paryapt* is used in the *Vigamya Rashtra* in place of *Karan Paryapt* which is famous in the Swetambar scriptures. Both terms have some similarity.
**Page 43:**
The Swetambar tradition has three aspects: *Kevalgyan*, *Keval Darshan*, and *Samavi Vishva*, while the Digambar tradition has only one aspect: *Sahabharitva*.
**Page 55, Note:**
The four *Chaumaha* and *Bosa* distinctions of *Kashaya* in relation to *Leshya* and *Ayu* are not found in the Swetambar tradition.
**Page 70, Note:**
There are two perspectives in the Swetambar tradition regarding the presence or absence of *Aupashmik Sammatva* in the *Aparyapt* state, but only the first perspective is mentioned in the *Gommatasar*.
**Page 82, Note:**
There are two perspectives in the *Karmapranth* regarding the number of *Ganasthanas* in the *Agnan Trika*, but only one perspective is mentioned in the *Gommatasar*.
**Page 116, Note:**
The number of *Narakas* in the *Gommatasar* differs from the number mentioned in the *Karmapranth*.
**Page 134:**
The shape and location of *Yaman* is considered differently in the Digambar tradition compared to the Swetambar tradition. The *Rajavatik* provides a very clear description of the external causes of the three *Yogas*.
**Page 154:**
The number of *Manah Paryapaman Yogas* is not the same in both traditions.