Book Title: Shabdanushasana
Author(s): Malaygiri, Bechardas Doshi
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 25
________________ HAS MALAYAGIRI SEEN SIDDHAHEMAVYĀKARAŅA ? We have already stated that though Malayagiri evinces respect for Ac. Hemacandra, he does not mention or refer to his Siddhahemavyākarana. But the employment of the two words vatsara'- vatsatara' by Malayagiri in the sutra pra-daśao (III. 16 ) points to the fact that Malayagiri was acquainted with the Siddhahemavyäkarana. It is because no other grammar except the Siddhahema mentions these two words. Again, in taddhitaprakarana (p. 416) Malayagiri has given an illustration of sātva-natvikam; and none but Hemacandra has written an independent şatva-natva-prakarana. So, Malayagiri's illustration of satva-natva soggests his acquaintance with Siddhahemavyākaraña. DIFFERENCE OF OPINION BETWEEN HEMACANDRA AND MALAYAGIRI : On some points Malayagiri differs from Āc. Hemacandra. They are as follows: (1) Malayagiri states: aśitpareșu ka-kha-pa-phesu' while Ac. Hemacandra writes ka-kha-pa-phi’ only and nowhere suggests 'asit pare.'. (2) According to Malayagiri, ' T afg' and 'art atfa' when conjoined become नृ: पाहि' and 'भवांश्चरति' respectively while according to Hemacandra नृन् पाहि becomes either n: पाहि or न पाहि and 'भवान् afa' becomes either Haieatfa' or 'waterfa. 3) In Malayagiri's Sabdānuśāsanavibhaktyantam padam' is followed by na kye', and 'na kye' is followed by 'nāma sit-ayavyañjane'. This means that the word 'nāma' does not follow from 'nāma sito in na kye'. Hence, Malayagiri writes : 'nakārāntan sabdarūpam vibhaktyantam' and gives manyā' as the pratyudāharana. The order of the sütras under consideration is the same as is found in the Sakata yapa. On the other hand, in the Siddhahema the sätra na kye' occurs after the sūtra 'nāma sidayavyañjane'. Thus it becomes possible here for the word 'nāma' to follow in the sūtra 'na kye.' This means : nakarāntam nāma kye pare pade syāt. This meaning is acceptable neither to Malayagiri nor to Sākațāyana. To corroborate our statement that Malayagiri was acquainted with the Siddhahemacandra vyākarana, we point out the similarity between the two vyākaranas. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 ... 640