Book Title: Nayakarnika Author(s): Vinayvijay, Mohanlal Dalichand Desai Publisher: ZZZ UnknownPage 56
________________ 48 NAYA-KARNIKA. the past because of its having ended, nor the future because of its having not arisen, but solely deals with the present and natural aspect of a thing because that alone is káryakûrin, i.e., useful for the moment. Argument as to the characteristics of the Straight Expression standpoint. अतीतेनानागतेन परस्कीयेन वस्तुना । न कार्यसिद्धिरित्येतद्सद्गगनपद्मवत् ॥ १२ ॥ [अतीतेन with the past ; अनागतेन with tho future ; परकीयेन with non-natural ; वस्तुना with a thing ; न not; कार्यसिद्धिः the serving of purpose; fa becausc; this; wrong, false ; गगनपद्मयत् like a sky-lotus.] Neither the past, nor the future, nor the non-natural qualities serve any purpose. They are false; [they are like] a sky-lotus (non-entity.) -12. Explanation. The argument underlying the rijusútra view point is that of immediate utility which naturally must be grounded upon the present aspect of a thing. For instance, it is of no use to a beggar in his present life if his son of a previous birth, or the would-be daughter-in-law of a future incarnation, i. e., re-birth, happens to be a ruling prince. In the same way, qualities not belonging to a thing would stand it in no good stead in the immediate concerns of life.Page Navigation
1 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67