Book Title: Medieval Jainism
Author(s): Bhasker Anand Saletore
Publisher: Karnataka Publishing House

Previous | Next

Page 234
________________ CRITICAL TIMES 219 of Jainas identical with the Kşapanakas Yāpaniyas, Nagna (or naked), and Bhagna (wounded) beggars mentioned in literature and epigraphic records.1 But the Ājivikas were not Jainas; and it is doubtful whether they can be identified with the Yāpaniyas mentioned in Jaina literature and in stone inscriptions. In the first place, we may note that the Ājīvikas are mentioned as distinct from the Jainas in Buddhist literature. Secondly, in 1. Rice, E. C. X. Kl. 28, p. 7. The Ajivika sect was founded by Gosala, a contemporary of Mahāvīra and Gautama. Charpentier is of opinion that the Ajīvikas were older than Gosala, himself. J. R. A. S. for 1913, pp. 669-674. But there is nothing new in this opinion, for Monier Williams expressed it long ago. J. R. A. S. XX, p. 277. (O.S.). Ramaswami makes Gośala a quondam disciple of Mahāvīra, Studies ; p. 7. The Ajivikas mentioned in the Edicts of Asoka, have been variously identified with Buddhist Bhiksus, Jaina mendicants, and even with Vaisnavites ! Read Hultzsch, Inscriptions of Asoka (Corpus Insc. Int dicarum, Vol. I.), pp. 136, and ibid, n(3), 181. They figure in Buddhist literature. Cowell, The Jataka ; I, pp. 124 ; 206, 229, 307 ; II. pp. 181, 187 ; III. p. 159; V. p. 8, 42, 45; VI. pp. 115, 119, 121 ; Geiger, Mahāvamso, p. 75, and ibid, n (2) ; Neumann, Digha Nikāya, pp. 2,248, and ibid, n(139) ; A. Banerjee Sastri, J. Bihar Or. R. S. XII, p. 532-562. For a full note on the Ajivikas read Hoernle's admirable account in Hastings, Encyclopædia of Religion and Ethics, I., pp. 259-268. Read also Benimadhab Barua, A History of Pre-Buddhistic Indian Philosophy, Ch. XXI, pp. 297-318 (Calcutta, 1921) [I owe this reference to Dr. Barua's work to Dr. S. M. Katre). Amulya Candra Sen, Schools and Sects in Jaina literature (Visvabhārati Studies. No.3). On their identification with the Vaişņavas, read Bühler, I. A. XX, pp. 316 seq. This is rejected by D. R. Bhandarkar, J. Bom. R. A. S., XXI, pp. 399 seq; 1. A. XLI, pp. 88, 286 seq. 2. Read Majjhima Nikaya. I. pp. 238, 524 ; Rhys Davids, Dialogues of the Buddha, I pp. 71, 219-220, 227, 232 (S.B.E.II) I owe these references to my wife.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448