Book Title: Mahavira and his Teaching
Author(s): C C Shah, Rishabhdas Ranka, Dalsukh Malvania
Publisher: Bhagwan Mahavir 2500th Nirvan Mahotsava Samiti

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 328
________________ THE ASCENDENCY & ECLIPSE OF BHAGAVĀN MAHĀVĪRA'S CULT 321 challenge of his co-poets that a celebate hermit could not handle successfully the erotic sentiment in a kavya. He won the bet. two 58. This episode naturally suggests that the extant version of the 'Silappadhikāram', which contains many erotic chapters in its first two cantos, and yet composed by a Jaina monk, Iļankoaḍikal, did not exist at the time of Tiru-t-takka Tévar. An alternative conclusion is also plausible,-viz., that the first cantos of Silappadhikaram' were not the handi work of Ilankoaḍikal, but has been tacked on to the third canto, 'Vanchi-kandam', composed by him. This 'Vanchi-kāṇḍam', by itself, possesses all the requisites of an independent poem. This redactor must be posterior to Tiruttakka-dévar in date. It is also very likely that the author of the first two cantos, (barring a few obvious interpolations) has composed them as an independent 'Tonmar' type of poem and names it 'Silppadhikāram', long anterior to Ilanko aḍikal. Iļanko aḍikal's main objective is also quite patent from the contents of the 'Vanchi-Kandam',-viz. to glorify his national as well as family deity, the famous 'Kodungallur Bhagavati and to make her a common deity acceptable to not only the Cheras, the Pandyas and the Chļas, but also to the Hindus, the Jainas and the Buddhists. The later redactor seems to have combined the two independent poems into one, with appropriate pantheistic touches here and there in both.1 59. Irrespective of the correctness or otherwise of our conjctural solution to the problem of the authorship of this epic, the epigraphical data cited above confirm our general conclusion that It was the late Professor P. T. Srinivasa Iyenger, who first mooted the idea of multiple authorship to the extant text of ‘śılappadhikāram’-The ancient Tamil Grammar, 'Tolakāppryam', defines 'Tonmar' as a type of archaic narrative poem, dealing with dharma, artha, kāma and mokṣa. Naccinarkiniyar, the great commentator of that grammar cites 'Silappadhikaram, as one of the examples of a 'Tonmar' poem, but does not mention the name of its author. Presumably it was the archetype version of the epic. M.M.-41 1. Jain Education International For Private Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509