Book Title: Law of Karma
Author(s): Nirmala Jha
Publisher: Capital Pubishing House Delhi

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 54
________________ Law of Karma All religions admit that apart from the body which perishes, there is something which does not change like the body. But, according to some of the later religions, although there is a part of us which never dies, it has a beginning. But anything that has a beginning must necessarily have an end. This objection has been very ably solved. The word 'beginning' simply means the beginning of the cycle. It never means the beginning of the cosmos. Nobody can imagine a time of beginning. To quote Bhagavadgīta: 44 Never did I not exist, nor you, nor will any of us hereafter cease to be. Your body will meet the death, but your soul never.11 Regarding the nature of the soul, most of the philosophers admit that Atman, whatever it be, has neither form, nor shape. And that which has neither form nor shape, must be omnipresent. It is beyond time, space and causation. Now, if it is beyond space and time, it must be infinite and the infinite cannot be two. If the soul is infinite, it must be only one in number. The doctrine of the manyness of soul which has been propounded by our ancient thinkers such as Jainas and Sankhya is not without objection. They admit that the soul is infinite in nature and, at the same time, they take it as many, which is illogical. According to Jain Philosophy, souls are many in number, which has innumerable qualities, of which we can know only some qualities. On the basis of above explanation, they establish their Pluralism or Anckantvāda as well as Syadvāda, which are known as the metaphysical and epistemological ground of Jainas respectively. Sankhya Philosophy also believes in the plurality of the selves. It explains this principle on the basis of the birth and death. Moreover, due to difference in human nature, they regard pluralism of the selves. Jan mamarankarṇānāń Pratiniyamatyugpatprvteśch Puruşa Vahutva Sidha. Traigunyaviparyayachhaiva. 12 But the inconsistency is that on the one hand, they believe in the plurality of selves, but on the other, they regard it as

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168