Book Title: Jaina Monuments of Andhra
Author(s): G Jawaharlal
Publisher: Sharada Publishing House Delhi

Previous | Next

Page 55
________________ 51 Jaina Caves and it continued upto the Satavahana period. Further, the four rockbeds were clearly meant for Jain monks who observe Sallekhana-vow during their last days. This natural Jain cave seems to be earliest known Jain settlement in Telangana. Guntupalli Caves These caves are actually found on the hill at Jilakaragudem, near Kamavarapukota in West Godavari district A.P. (Fig-4). Jilakaragudem is a small village about 7 miles from Kamavarapukota in West Godavari district. It can be reached only by bus from Eluru town, the District headquarters. Till now, it is believed that the ruins of Jilakaragudem belonged to an early Buddhist establishment that flourished in 2nd century B.C.(Fig 4A) The excavators like Rea and Longhurst, observing the horse-shoe shaped ravine in the sand-stone hill, running from East to West, a circular rock-cut temple containing a monolithic Stupa, a large rock-cut vihara, a ruined brick chaitya, remains of a large pillared hall and an inscription, believed that these remains indicate an early Buddhist settlement in Andhra.12 But, the recent conservation work at Jilakaragudem caves revealed some thrilling facts. The discovery of an inscription of a Mahameghavahana Chief of Kalinga (viz.) Sada, at Jilakaragudem caves clearly reveals the Jain nature of these caves13 (Fig5). We know, that the family of Mahameghavahana Sada to which the great Jain champion Kharavela, the Chief of Kalinga, belonged, extended his full support to Jainism.14 Further, it is learnt from the above inscription that the ancient name of the hill at Jilakaragudem was 'Mahanagaparvata' and not Pithunda as mentioned by Ptolemy. Now it may be stated, without any fear of contradiction, that the Jilakaragudem rock-cut monasteries which are popularly known as Guntupalli caves, were originally occupied by the Jainas and not by the Buddhists as hitherto believed. In this context it is worthwhile to quote the observation of V.A. Smith,15 "in some cases, monuments which are really Jain, have been erroneously described as Buddhist". Although it was originally a Jain-tirtha, lateron it was appropriated by the Buddhists. At present it is being considered as a Hindu-kshetra.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200