Book Title: Jaina Art and Architecture Vol 01
Author(s): A Ghosh
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 196
________________ MONUMENTS & SCULPTURE A.D. 300 TO 600 TERRACOTTAS In relation to these sculptures, the terracottas lack in artistry and seem to repeat an archaism which they had inherited. Among those from Vaisal there are about a dozen figurines identified with Naigamega, the Jaina deity of child-birth. They are characterized by an animal-face with goat-like features and long dangling ears having either pierced holes or slitmarks. Generally the mouth is indicated by a deep-cut slit just below a hooked nose. Three types are evident in the Vaisali terracottas of Naigameşa viz., female, male and couples, either with a child or without it; among these the female type is predominant. In the similar figurines of Kushan period horns over ears are an added feature. The excavations at sites IV and V of Kumrahar have supplied a dozen of such figurines belonging to Period IV (circa A.D. 300-450) and Period V (circa A.D. 450-600). They represent the male and female varieties and are similar in style to the Vaisali specimens. All these terracotta figurines are hand-made and have nothing like the sweeping charm of Ahicchatra Naigameşa figures. Cursorily hand-modelled, archaic and crude, they appear to belong to some hieratical tradition which had not been transformed by the touch of the classical plasticity and sophistication. There is, however, a suggestion that among the Paharpur terracottas some 'older panels might have been readjusted when the Jaina monastery was reshaped during the eighth century." Paharpur, it is said, witnessed a transformation of art-idiom from Gupta to medieval," but the extant finds fail to reveal Jaina affiliations of any such art-activity. [PART III Pp. 229-34. "Stella Kramarisch, Indian Sculptures, London, p. 216. 1 Krishna Deva and Mishra, op. cit., p. 51, plate XII C 7: Sinha and Roy, op. cit., pp. 162-63, pl. LII, figs. 1-9. Sinha and Roy classify Period IV of Vaišäll, to which these terracottas belong, as chronologically covering circa A.D. 200-600. For Harinegameşa, see U.P. Shah in Journal of the Indian Society of Oriental Art, XIX, 1952-53, pp. 19 ff. V.S. Agrawala in Ancient India, 4, 1947-48, p. 134. Krishna Deva and Mishra, op. cit., p. 51. Agrawala, op. cit., pp. 134-37, plate XLVIII A. C.C. Dasgupta, Origin and Development of Glay Sculptures in India, Calcutta 1961, 126 R.N. MISRA

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345