Book Title: Jaina Art and Architecture Vol 01
Author(s): A Ghosh
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 183
________________ CHAPTER 111 EAST INDIA discarded in view of the evidence provided by the inscription which came to light on the outer wall of western cave. This Sanskrit inscription declares that Muai Vairs (Vajra) causod to be made two caves worthy of ascetics, in which were installed the images of Arhats. Bloch assigned the inscription to the third or fourth century A.D. Konow pushed back the date of the cave by a century. Shah has supported Konow and identified Muni Vaira of the inscription with Vajra the great Svetambara Acarya who died in the 584th year of Mahavira's nirvana (A.D. 57)." Shah follows Saraswati (although on a different evidence), who says that the Sonbhandár cave agrees essentially with the Mauryan Barabar and Nagarjuni caves and perhaps belongs to a date not far removed from them. However, the date of the inscription, as suggested by Bloch, has been retained by Kuraishi and Ghosh, and the characters of the inscription as well as the six figures of Jaina Tirthankaras carved in relief on the southern wall of the eastern cave confirm this date. Close to the inscription in the western Sonbhandar cave there is a faintly perceptible outline of the lower half of a Jina figure.' Inside the cave there is another relief in outline depicting a seated Jina accompanied by an artistic female figure holding cauri. In those details the caves correspond to the details of the inscription. The association of Digambara Jaina sect with Vaibharagiri is confirmed by Hiuen Tsang, 11. Bloch in Archaeological Survey of India, Annual Report, 1905-06, Calcutta, 1909, p. 98 Ibid., p. 106, Shah, op. cir., p. 14. Shah admits the existence of only two Jaina Acaryas of the Dame Vajra, the first of them mentioned in the Avasyaka-Niryukti and the second in the Triloka-Praffiapti. or there, the former, according to Shah, finds mention in the Sonbhandar inscription. As regards the chronological incompatibility involved in this identification, Shah says that the inscription may be posthumous. He does not accept the existence of any other Vaira (Vajca) then the two above, because, he says, 'had it been so, his name would not have passed unnoticed in any of the different Sthavirdvalis.' U.P. Shah, Journal of Bihar Research Society, XXXIX, 1953, pp. 410-12. [Dr Jyoti Prasad Jain, 10 personal communication, says : It no happens that a Digambarı saint of the name of Viradeva finds mention in a record from Karnataka, Epigraphia Carnatica, X, 1905 p. 73) of about the middle of the fourth century AD. Editor. Seo also chapter 8.-Bditor.) The plaiones of the caves cannot be doubted. But it is interesting that these Sonbhandar caves are similar to those at Udaigiri (Vidiša) in that they are not completely rook-cut. Tho sockets on the exterior of the Sonbhandar caves indicate that originally some kind of wooden extension was appended to them. A brick superstructure and verandah ta tront of the eastern Cave an also aatiootbleThese fostures are present in the Gapte caves At Vidalgui ało. .Cunaingham, Archanalogical Survey of India Reports, X, Cutoutta, 1880, p. 46. * Kuraishi, op. okt., 1934, p In Beel, y, ale, 1, 158,

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345