Jain Journal 1969 10

Author(s): Jain Bhawan Publication
Publisher: Jain Bhawan Publication

Page 28

OCTOBER, 1969
and in the case of the jivas, it signifies Deva, etc. paryāyas. Vibhāva or aśuddha artha paryāya consists of passions (kaşāyas). Colour, taste, etc. of molecules are vibhāva artha paryāya and modes of molecules are vibhāva vyañjana paryāya of matter (pudgala). Svabhāva artha paryāya is agu ru-laghu sat-guņi hāni věddhi paryāya.
7. Samyama Prakāśa describes these paryāyas as follows : (pages 46-68)
Modifications of jīva Kevala jñāna, kevala darśana, etc. Mati, śruta, avadhi, manahparyāya Deva, Nāraka, etc. Siddha paryāya
Svabhāva artha paryāyo Vibhāva artha paryāyo Vibhāva vyañjana paryāya Svabhāva vyañjana paryāya
Svabhāva artha paryāya
Modifications of pudgala Colour, taste, etc. existing in
paramāņu Colour, taste, etc. existing
in skanda Mode or shape of a paramāņu Mode or shape of a molecule
Vibhāva artha paryāya Svabhāva vyañjana paryāya Vibhāva vyañjana paryāya.
Vibhāva vyañjana paryāya happens only in jivas and pudgala. In dharma, adharma, akāśa and kālānus only svabhāva artha paryāya exists.
8. Acarya Subhacandra states in his Tikā on Kārtikeyānuprekṣā, gāthā 220, that jivas and pudgalas undergo sukşma and bādara paryāyas. Kevala jñāna, kevaladarśana, etc., are sukşma paryāyas of jīva. Mati, śruta, avadhi and manahparyāya, Deva, Nāraka, etc., paryāyas are bādara paryāyas of jīva. His opinion here signifies that the same paryāya if suksma is svabhāva paryāya and if bādara is vibhāva paryāya. Hence he took a different view of vyañjana paryāya from all others.
The commentary on gāthā 242 (page 173) of Kārtikeyānuprekşā gives a complete summary of his views on both the paryāyas. As he designated all višeșa guņas to vyañjana paryāya, it means aguru-laghu sať-guņi hāni viddhi paryaya refers to sāmānya gunas (common attributes). Again Aguru-laghutva, dravyatva and prameyatva all belong to common attributes. He states aguru laghu șat-guņi hāni výddhi paryāya is svabhāva, sukşma and exists in all the six substances.
In conformity with his commentary on gāthā 220 it can be said that he ascribes vyañjana paryāya with sukṣmatva and sthūlatva also. He