Book Title: History Of Jainism With Special Reference To Mathura
Author(s): U K Sharma
Publisher: D K Printworld P L

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 115
________________ Post-Mahāvīra Period and the Contribution of Jainism fifteenth century AD, and scholars like Jacobi are inclined to accept it as true. 166 The causes of dissent in most of these schisms pertained to minor points in the doctrines of Jainism. Therefore, these schisms left no permanent mark on the Jaina community. But the last schism produced serious consequences. It was a split which divided the Jaina community into two sects – the Svetambara and the Digambara – and each of these two sects claimed greater authenticity than the other. This split left a mark on the pattern of the development of Jainism, on its regional spread, monastic practices, iconography, etc.167 After this division became well-established, the differences between the Svetāmbaras and the Digambaras centred around numerous subjects. Causes of the split in Jainism The Svetāmbara and the Digambara accounts are at variance with each other regarding the causes of this split.168 These accounts appear to be products of sectarian hatred.169 Literary writings and early sculptures prove that170 most of the differences between the Svetāmbaras and the Digambaras were outcome of historical growth.171 The Jainas who lived in various parts of India remained isolated from each other for long because of the vastness of the country; they, therefore, developed different beliefs and customs, and became aware of these differences about the end of the first century AD.172 According to one tradition, this split occurred in AD 79 and according to another in AD 82.173 In view of this some date about AD 80 should be accepted 166. CMHI, II, pp. 356-7. 167. HJM, pp. 79ff.; AOIU, p. 416; ACHI, p. 102. 168. LDJC, pp. 26-9; JSS, pp. 39-45; HJM, pp. 80-3; JIR, pp. 54-5. 169. AOIU, p. 416; HJM, p. 83. 170. Ibid., p. 416. 171. Ibid.; ERE, VII, p. 473; JSS, p. 45; LDJC, p. 28. 172. ERE, VII, p. 473. 173. GD, p. 108; CHAI, III, p. 297 fn. 4; JIR, p. 54; CMHI, II, p. 362. 93

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304