________________
A ground-plan of the Vyavahārakānda
xiii
mon to it and the earlier expressions i cases the text has been regarded as com"aa" and "9-92" have been respectively ing from each one of the ķis'is. used; e. g.' *7791', $4757'.
(13) Texts which have been quoted as (9) A semi-colon marks a close of the coming from no specified sage but reference and the v.l. of each work, and a merely with words like fa evi, tafa:, full point is added after all works quoted स्मृत्यन्तरम् , have been quoted under the head in connection with a text, have been ex- erat. hausted.
(14) Texts quoted neither as from a If a text recurs in a work and the
specific sage nor as THTU, fa, tate, same v. l. occurs in all the quotations,
have been quoted under the heading the references to pages are separated by
"अनिर्दिष्टकर्तकवचनम्" and are indicated in means of commas; e.g. afa. 84,42,840.
the foot-notes by the sign (=), which A colon has been used between a v. 1.
shows that the provenance is not and the reference when the same text
specified appears with a v. l. on different pages;
(15) A v. 1 is given in the place e. g. A . 42 9C (NT): 840.
where the commentary quotation contains
a reference to it with the words fa (10) The same text is quoted by differ
4181ATT, 44: 917: or cyfa 976:. ent treatise writers under the names of
(16) In the section of Dāyabhāga the different Risis; in such cases the text has
Balambhatti on the two stanzas, II, 135 been quoted under the name of the Risi
and II, 145 which covers a considerable to whom it has been attributed by the majority of the early treatise-writers;
number of pages has been quoted in the
usual way with figures for chapter and while the Risi to whom the modern writers
verse and also with figures for pages. attribute it are mentioned in the foot
(17) No. v. l have been given in the notes. When a text, on the other hand,
case of synonyms of the type of तटाकis attributed by some of the early treat
421, 744-4, 312-38, -f44, air-att, ises to a certain Risi and by others to
44-044, 4919-27. another, it has been regarded as of both.
(18) No. v. l. has been given in the (11) When a text has been quoted by case of alternative forms for Samdhis, the early writers without mention of a e. g. 43- 18. name and by a single modern writer to a (19) References to the passages, from specified Rişi, it has been regarded as his. che Agnipurāna and the S'ukraniti, which
(12) The treatise-writers attribute a were similar to the works of other Risis text to several Rişis, e. g. to Narada
have been made to the respective Ķişis. and Brahaspati or to Manu, Nárada,
And those that were different have been Harita and Baudhāyana. In such independently quoted.
