________________
170
not to say that other Indian communities practised the same penaoce. To be convinced of this, it will suffice: to review briefly, those which; in some respect, resemble the parihāra,
it is....The pațichanna-parivāsa; probation?, of the Buddhist has been pic.compared, nto.it (Kip: 12). The Buddhist : penitent, is indeed morally
di banished fron, the company of his brethren. He must not share: a roof cuid in:with an innocent person : na...eka-cchanne :āvāse vatthabbam, na eka-cchanne
anāvāse yatthübbam; na eka-ichanne āvāse va anävase :vā valt habbam (Vin II 33,-. 194 12-15). But he must not install himself in a solitary: residence, either (ibid
-32, 22 ff.). This mitigated form of exclusion recalls that imposed on the ac parihariya. On the other hand, the monk undergoing "probation”, must not
be saluted; he is relegated to the last and lowliest places and no notice, is . taken of dicisions which he might attempt to make concerning the company.
But he does rise before a regular monk, and offers him a seat (ibid 31 ff). www.. The same prohibtions characterise the atonement mānatla (cf. SBB,
X, 196 p. 5), but the excommunication is again tempered, at least in the ita case of a nun. Indeed it is said that a nun upon whom it had been im
posed would have remarked that two contradictory prohibitions bad been.
placed on her the pebitént is forbiddenittö livé alónes aád any other 2 . téliğious is theoretically forbidden to live in her company The Buddha
would then have commanded their community to assiga her a companion ir.(Vin: I1,279 19. ff:)....... . .! !
! What ther' happens to the "suspendédiuifélīgiấus (ükshittà) = ? He shows il 'deference to the innocents by rising when ithey approacb, büt be išicótbidden o aiialli co'mmerisality with the samjha, asambhogam sargherita (lvin IF 21 f.)
31552 Woras':which recall the nidhañá tenth provision of the patihära! Was the doiros: plishment then illi defined ? The-Cülla-vagga fulbidsfonly the sambhoga,
while the Viblianga pronouncés" jointly three prohibitions or såmbhnga, 14. shithyasa's and's céping under the same roof: (IV 137, 19' f**) Regular.
religious must respect the proliibition, under "pain of 'liavihg, (herselves, . 10 do: penance (päcitliya, ibid). ""; ..::::: : MT .
HT, ''As for the severést: of: - all :(pārājika), its proclamation is of necessity 3:12 accompanied by an express'prohibition of cohabitation" (samvašá)'parājiko ... hori asamvāso'li (Vin III 21, 25**; 22, 34**; etc.; cf. SBB X, xxvi
