________________
161
the Indian Union fought while with rogard to some other place ( Kshetra ) e. g, the places enoroached upon by Pakistan, it did not fight but chose to carry on negotiations with the encroaching State. This rendered the nature of the Indian Union inexpressible in accordance with the principle of the fourth Bhanga. But although language is incapable of expressing the exact nature of the Indian Union in this connection when two apparently contradictory lines of action are attributed to it, we have chosen to describe it as non-violent'. This non-violence is a new attribute, transcending the said two positive and negative aspects. Accordingly, when the sixth Bhanga says that the Indian Union is non-fighting in respect of some places and is nonviolent in some respects, it gives us a new information about the nature of the Indian Union. It refers to “wonderful parience on the part of the Indian State which thus is an essential part of its nature, an attribute which was not implied either in the judgment of negation or in the judgment, referring to inexpressibility or in the two judgments if they are simply placed side by side. . (2). The seoond example referred simultaneously to both the interfering and the non
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
