Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
[498] In the Chakkhandagama, a question about bondage and its components.
[3, 223... The pattern of bondage for the Tirthankara nature is similar to the pattern of bondage for the remaining natures. The only difference is that in their pattern, one should say "from the distracted restrained" onwards. || 222 ||...
The reason for this is that the nature of mind-perception knowledge is not possible below the distracted restrained state.
In the Kevalanāṇīs, who is bound and who is unbound? || 223 ||
The Sayogikevali is bound. The Sayogikevali, at the end of his time, becomes unbound. These are bound, the rest are unbound. || 224 ||
According to the theory of the restrained, the breaking of the natural patterns of mind-perception knowledge is the same for the restrained beings. || 225 ||
The only difference is, who is bound and who is unbound in the case of the Sātavedanīya? || 226 ||
From the distracted restrained to the Sayogikevali, all are bound. The Sayogikevali, at the end of his time, becomes unbound. These are bound, the rest are unbound. || 227 ||
In the case of the Sāmayika, Chhedopasthāpanā-śuddhi-restrained, who is bound and who is unbound in the case of the five knowledge-obscurations [four vision-obscurations], Sātavedanīya, Sanjvalanalobha, Yaśaḥkīrti, Ucchagotra, and the five hindrances? || 228 ||
From the distracted restrained to the non-restraining cessation, pacifier, and destroyer, all are bound. These are bound, there are no unbound. || 229 ||
The pattern of the remaining natures is the same as that of the mind-perception knowledge. || 230 ||