Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## 362
The nature of the soul (the soul's own state), which is worthy of being called 'Dhyana' (meditation) because it is devoid of association with other substances due to the shedding of the covering of the nine substances and the path to liberation, due to the infinite knowledge and perception, due to the complete pure knowledge consciousness, and due to the transcendental nature, is described as the cause of the exhaustion (diminution) of the power of the karmas accumulated in the past or their fall (destruction), as the cause of exhaustion. ||152||
**Commentary:**
Here, the text explains the nature of Dhyana (meditation) as the cause of the exhaustion of all substances, which is the destruction of the four types of karmas that are the cause of the remaining sensations, etc.
The explanation is given in the form of refutation of the words "Dansa" etc. By "Dansa" and "Nana" (knowledge) and "Darsana" (perception), what is meant is complete (perfect) Dhyana (meditation). Again, what is the specific nature of this Dhyana? It is not associated with any other substance. Such Dhyana is the cause of exhaustion. Of whom? Of the soul, which is associated with its own pure nature.
Indeed, the liberated Kevali (omniscient being), having attained the state described earlier, is free from all modifications and is characterized by supreme bliss, and is satisfied with the happiness arising from his own nature. Due to the destruction of the covering of knowledge and perception, he has inherent pure knowledge and perception, and due to the transformation of his consciousness into pure consciousness, he is free from the activities of the senses and the dependence on external substances. Therefore, his nature is devoid of association with other substances, and is characterized by unwavering consciousness. Seeing the destruction of the state and the melting away of the karmas accumulated in the past, which are the cause of Dhyana, this nature of the soul is called Dhyana, in a metaphorical sense.
**Objection:**
The disciple asks, "This Dhyana, which is devoid of dependence on other substances, may be for the Kevalis (omniscient beings). Why? Because it is said that Dhyana is metaphorical for the Kevalis. In the texts like "Charitra Sara", it is said that "those who are in the state of hypocrisy, meditate on the substance atom or the state atom, and produce Kevala Jnana (omniscient knowledge)". How can this be devoid of dependence on other substances?"
**Resolution:**
The text says that the word "substance atom" refers to the subtle nature of the substance, and the word "state atom" refers to the subtle nature of the state. It is not the pudgala atom. This explanation is given in the "Sarvartha Siddhi" commentary.
The explanation of this dialogue is as follows: The word "substance" refers to the soul substance. Its atom is the state that is free from attachment and aversion. What is the meaning of "atom"? It is the subtle state. How is it subtle? It is subtle because it is beyond the reach of the state of samadhi without discrimination. This is the explanation of the word "substance atom".
The word "state" refers to the state of self-awareness and knowledge of the soul substance. Its atom is the state that is free from attachment, aversion, etc. What is the meaning of "atom"? It is the subtle state that is free from attachment, aversion, etc. How is it subtle? It is subtle because it is beyond the reach of the senses and the mind. This is the explanation of the word "state atom".
The meaning here is that for the initial stabilization of the mind, and for the purpose of deceiving the mind with the desire for objects, the liberated beings, the five supreme beings, etc., are to be meditated upon. When the mind becomes stable through intense meditation, then one should meditate on one's own pure soul nature.
Thus, it is said by Sri Pujyapada Swami in the explanation of "Nischya Dhyeya" (object of meditation): "The soul, being the doer, meditates on the soul, which is the object of action, with the soul as the instrument, and thus becomes omniscient."
The explanation of this is as follows: The soul, being the doer, meditates on the soul, which is the object of action, with the soul as the instrument, and thus becomes omniscient.
Therefore, knowing the relationship between the means and the end, and the relationship between the object of meditation and the meditator, there should be no dispute about the object of meditation. ||152||