Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
**Pancastikaya Prabhrit**
155. The **Nayaayika** (logician) who holds the special view says, "If there is no distinction between substance and qualities in isolation, then designation etc. are not established." The answer to this is that even if there is distinction between substance and qualities in some respects and non-distinction in some respects, designation etc. can still occur. For example, the sixth case and the agent, object, instrument, recipient, separation, and location, these six cases are of two types. In one type of distinction, for example, "Devadatta's cow" is said, and in the other type of non-distinction, for example, "the branch of the tree," "the infinite knowledge etc. qualities of the soul." The case is explained as follows: "Devadatta, the man named, being the agent, breaks the fruit-like object with his goad-like instrument for Dhanadatta in the garden-like location from the tree." This is an example of the case in distinction, in which all six cases are different. Similarly, "the soul, being the agent, contemplates its own soul-like object with its own soul-like instrument for the sake of its own soul in its own soul-like location near its own soul-like base." This is an example of the six cases in non-distinction. In both these examples, the distinction and non-distinction of the case are explained. Now, the aspect of size is explained. "Devadatta is tall" is the same as "the house is large" in distinction, and "the long branch of the long tree is heavy" and "the concrete substance has concrete qualities" are the same in non-distinction.
Now, the aspect of number is explained. "Devadatta has ten villages" is the number in distinction, and similarly, "the tree has ten branches" or "the substance has infinite qualities" is the number in non-distinction. Here, in the verse, the meaning of the word "vishaya" (object) is "base," which is shown as follows: "There are cows in the "gostha" (cowshed)" is the object in distinction, and similarly, "there are qualities in the substance" is the object in non-distinction. In this way, designation etc. are established in both distinction and non-distinction, therefore, the distinction between substance and qualities in isolation is not established.
In this verse, the **Jivaastikaya** (soul) which is not definitely named as "man," "hell-being," etc., which are born from name-karma-udaya (the rise of karma related to name), and which is not definitely associated with the six bodies, such as the square, etc., is still, in terms of convention, according to the previous logic, associated with a body of a size slightly smaller than the final body, and which is infinite in number due to its infinite qualities, such as omniscience, etc., is still associated with an infinite number due to having an infinite number of pure regions according to the evidence of the world and space, and which is not the object of the five senses, which are the enjoyers of the pleasure of the objects of the five senses, is still, due to the feeling of the pure soul devoid of the objects of the five senses, the object of the contemplation of the one pleasure-form, which is free from attachment and eternally blissful, which contemplation is transforming into the feeling of supreme equality-rasa (taste) in all the regions of the soul, such a pure **Jivaastikaya** soul is the one that is to be grasped. This is the meaning. || 46 ||