Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
Gommatasara Karmakanda - 120
When the number of subtle-inadequate (sookshma-aparyapt) states is reduced by the number of states from the highest state of subtle-inadequate to the lowest state of subtle-inadequate, the proof of the lowest state of subtle-inadequate is obtained.
The proof amount is 343, the fruit amount is the proof of the distinctions of the state of false belief of the one-sense being (the fraction of an asankhyata), the desired amount is 2. Here, multiplying the fruit amount by the desired amount and dividing by the proof amount, the number of states from the lowest state of subtle-inadequate to the lowest state of inadequate after the bond of the lowest state of subtle-inadequate is obtained. There are two divisions in this interval. When the number of distinctions is reduced from the lowest state of subtle-inadequate, the lowest state of inadequate is obtained.
The proof amount and fruit amount are as mentioned above, and the desired amount is 14. Here, multiplying the fruit amount by the desired amount and dividing by the proof amount, the number of states from the bond of the lowest state of inadequate to the lowest state of subtle-inadequate after the bond of the lowest state of inadequate is obtained. There are 14 divisions in this interval. When the number of distinctions is reduced from the lowest state of inadequate, the proof of the lowest state of subtle-inadequate is obtained.
The proof and fruit amount are as mentioned above, and the desired amount is 98. Here, multiplying the fruit amount by the desired amount and dividing by the proof amount, the number of states from the bond of the lowest state of subtle-inadequate to the lowest state of inadequate after the bond of the lowest state of subtle-inadequate is obtained, and there are 98 divisions in this interval. When the number of distinctions is reduced from the lowest state of subtle-inadequate, the lowest state of inadequate is obtained. This lowest state bond, which was mentioned for the one-sense being, is to be known. In this way, there are four types of beings in the fourteen types of being assemblies in the one-sense being, in relation to the subtle-inadequate and adequate of the subtle-inadequate, and there are eight states due to the distinctions of the lowest state bond and the highest state bond. In this way, the proof of the state bond in the eight states is mentioned. To know the proof of the distinctions of the state in the seven intervals between these eight, the statement of seven three-term rules is made.
The proof of the obstacle time should also be obtained in the same way through the three-term rule. Showing this,
The highest obstacle of the false belief of the one-sense being is the fraction of an asankhyata of the highest number of avalis, and the lowest obstacle is only one antarmukhurta. Here, when the lowest is subtracted from the highest, one time increases in each obstacle, therefore, when divided by one, the proof that comes in that, when one is added to it, the proof of all the distinctions of the obstacle of the false belief of the one-sense being is obtained. In the same way as the state bond...