Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Gatha 466-506
## Leshyamargna/585
And in relation to the Neel Leshyas, one should know the same in relation to Kapoot and Neel Leshyas. The special feature is that this statement should be made starting with Kapootleshya.
From the shelter of Kapoot and Tejo Leshyas, the statement of the smallness of the number of Sankrama and Pratigraha Sthanas is as follows:
* The inferior Sankrama and inferior Sthana of Kapootleshya are both equal in quantity.
* The inferior Sthana and inferior Sankrama of Tejo Leshya are both equal in quantity and are infinitely greater than them.
* The inferior Pratigraha Sthana of Kapoot is infinitely greater.
* The inferior Pratigraha Sthana of Tejo is infinitely greater.
* The superior Sankrama Sthana of Kapoot is infinitely greater.
* The superior Sankrama Sthana of Tejo is infinitely greater.
* The superior Pratigraha Sthana of Kapoot is infinitely greater.
* The superior Pratigraha Sthana of Tejo is infinitely greater.
* The superior Sthana of Kapoot is infinitely greater.
* The superior Sthana of Tejo is infinitely greater.
From the shelter of Tejo, Padam, and Leshyas, the statement of the smallness of the number of Sankrama and Pratigraha Sthanas is as follows:
* The inferior Sthana of Tejo is negligible.
* The inferior Pratigraha Sthana of Tejo is infinitely greater.
* The inferior Sthana and Sankrama of Padam are both equal in quantity and are infinitely greater.
* The inferior Sankrama Sthana of Tejo is infinitely greater.
* The inferior Pratigraha Sthana of Padam is infinitely greater.
* The superior Pratigraha Sthana of Tejo is infinitely greater.
* The superior Sankrama Sthana of Padam is infinitely greater.
* The superior Sankrama and superior Sthana of Tejo are infinitely greater.
* The superior Pratigraha Sthana of Padam is infinitely greater.
* The superior Sthana of Padam is infinitely greater.
From the shelter of Padam, Shukla, and Leshyas, the statement of the smallness of the number of Sankrama and Pratigraha Sthanas is as follows:
* The inferior Sthana of Padam is negligible.
* The inferior Pratigraha Sthana of Padam is infinitely greater.
* The inferior Sankrama and inferior Sthana of Shukla are both equal in quantity and are infinitely greater.
* The inferior Sankrama Sthana of Padam is infinitely greater.
* The inferior Pratigraha Sthana of Shukla is infinitely greater.
* The superior Pratigraha Sthana of Padam is infinitely greater.
* The superior Sankrama Sthana of Shukla is infinitely greater.
* The superior Sthana and Sankrama of Padam are infinitely greater.
* The superior Pratigraha Sthana of Shukla is infinitely greater.
* The superior Sthana of Shukla is infinitely greater.
In this way, one should also state the smallness of the number of three, four, five, and six combinations. From this and the commentary on Gatha 518, it is known that there are some middle parts that are found in all six Leshyas.
The proof of the Sathsthana Patit Leshya Sthanas is the countless Lokas. Among them, the Sthanas of Kapootleshya are negligible. The Sthanas of Neel Leshya are countless times greater. The Sthanas of Krishna Leshya are countless times greater. The Sthanas of Tejo Leshya are countless times greater. The Sthanas of Padam Leshya are countless times greater. The Sthanas of Shukla Leshya are countless times greater.
- The names and definitions of these six Sthanas. Although they have been stated in detail in the Shrutagyan, they are also stated briefly here:
* Anant Bhagavrudhi
* Asankhyat Bhagavrudhi
* Sankhyat Bhagavrudhi
* Sankhyat Gunavrudhi
* Asankhyat Gunavrudhi
* Anant Gunavrudhi
These are the six वृद्धि (Vrudhi). Similarly, there are six हानि (Hani).
* The quantity of Anant is the entire Jeevarashi.
* The quantity of Asankhyat is countless Lokas.
* The quantity of Sankhyat is...
1. Dhaval Pu. 16 p. 466.
2. Dhaval Pu. 16 p. 466-467.
3. Dhaval Pu. 16 p. 467.
4. Dhaval Pu. 16 p. 467.
5. See the commentary on Gatha 288 and 292-65 of this same text.
6. Dhaval Pu. 16 p. 573.