Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Verse 486, 460
The text acknowledges the predominance of four-sensory and five-sensory beings in the statement of evidence.
Beings are found from the state of false perception (one-sensory) to the state of subtle-passion, passionless, and disguised-state, because beings in the disguised-state without the destruction and pacification of the non-seeing perception are not found.
The number of beings in these twelve states is the same as the evidence of those who have the seeing perception, which is infinite.
The evidence of those who have the seeing perception is the same as those who have the knowledge perception, because beings who have the knowledge perception without the seeing perception are not found, therefore the evidence of both is the same.
## Shyamagam / 573
The being who has the only seeing perception is the same as the being who has the only knowledge, because a being who has the only seeing perception without the only knowledge is not found.
Thus, the fourteenth chapter of the Gommatasara Jivakanda, called Darshanmarganga, is complete.
## 15. Leshyamarganga Chapter
## The Characteristic of Leshya
The text states that Leshya is what makes a being attached to and controlled by merit and demerit. This is the nature of Leshya, as stated by the Ganadharas and others who know the nature of Leshya.
Yoga-pravritti is Leshya. When Yoga-pravritti is influenced by the arising of passions, then the work of both Yoga-pravritti and the arising of passions is described in the supreme scripture as the fourfold bondage.
## Special Meaning
Leshya is that which makes the soul attached to karmas. Leshya is that which establishes the connection between the soul and pravritti (karma). Thus, by defining Leshya in this way, there is no fault of excessive inclusion, because here the word pravritti is taken as a synonym for karma.
If Leshya is considered to arise only from the arising of passions, then there would be a problem of the influence of Leshya in beings with subtle passions. But Yoga, which is the arising of karma, is also Leshya, because it is also a cause of karma-bondage. Even when passions are destroyed, Yoga remains, therefore there is no contradiction in considering Leshya in beings with subtle passions. Or, the body-yoga, speech-yoga, and mind-yoga influenced by passions,