Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
518 / Go. Sa. Jivakanda
Verses 445-447
Doubt - Why does a *Rjhumati Man:paryaygyani* not know the unthought, unspoken, and unacted meaning, even though they are aware of the mind?
Solution - They do not know because they are affected by the specific *kshayopasham*.
A *Rjhumati Man:paryaygyani* cannot know the unthought, unspoken, and unacted meaning, therefore they need to rely on the actions of the mind, speech, and body. However, a *Vipulmati Man:paryaygyani* knows even the thought meaning (Go. Ji. Ga. 438), therefore they do not need to rely on the senses, nine senses, or yoga.
Doubt - This knowledge arises from the mind, so does it become *matijnana*?
Solution - No, because in *Man:paryaygyana*, there is only reliance on the mind. Although it functions only through the power of *kshayopasham*, its behavior is only based on the mind of oneself and others. For example, "Look at the moon in the sky," here, the behavior is based only on the reliance on the sky. That is, there is only reliance on the mind here. This knowledge knows the meaning that exists in the minds of others, this is the only reliance on the mind here.
"The difference between *Rjhumati* and *Vipulmati* *Man:paryaygyana* is due to purity and non-falling. ||24||" *Vipulmati* *Man:paryaygyana* is purer and non-falling, while *Rjhumati* *Man:paryaygyana* is less pure and falling.
The purity that comes to the soul when the *Man:paryaygyana* covering karma is *kshayopasham* is called purity. Falling is called *pratipat* and not falling is called *apratipat*. Due to the rise of *charitramohaneya* in a *kapay* being, they lose their restraint-peak, which leads to *pratipat*. And due to the lack of a cause for the fall of a *kshinakshay* being, there is no *pratipat*. There is a difference between *Rjhumati* and *Vipulmati* based on these two. *Vipulmati* is purer than *Rjhumati* in terms of substance, field, time, and *bhaatra*. One should know that purity is due to the ability to make increasingly subtle substances as objects, because they have increasingly excellent *kshayopasham*, therefore *Vipulmati* has more purity than *Rjhumati*.
*Vipulmati* is also unique in terms of *pratipat*, because its owners have *pravaddhaman* *charitra*. But *Rjhumati* is *pratipati*, because its owners have *charitra* that decreases (diminishes) due to the rise of *kashay*.
It is a rule that *Vipulmati* *Man:paryaygyana* belongs to those who, while being *tadhva* *mokshagami*, ascend to the *kshapkakshani*. But there is no such rule for *Rjhumati* *Man:paryaygyana*. It can belong to a *tadhva* *mokshagami* or to someone else. Similarly, the *kshapka* category...
1. P. Pu. Pri. 63. 2. Sarvarthasiddhi A. 1 Su. 6. 3. T. Su. A. 1. 4. V 5, Sarvarthasiddhi . 1 Lu. 24.