Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
The **Shri Sutra Kritanga Sutra** states: The rising of the sun, which is observed daily, is marked by the opening of lotuses and the beginning of the day. This action is also inferred from the movement of Devadatta and others from one place to another. Similarly, the moon, which wanes daily, reaches its complete depletion and then grows again with its phases, until it reaches its full state, which is observed by everyone. Likewise, rivers flow with waves of water during the rainy season. The wind is inferred from the breaking of trees, tremors, and other phenomena.
You say that all this is like illusion, a dream, or magic. This is not true, because if everything were non-existent, then there would be no truth to any illusory form, and thus illusion itself would be non-existent. And who would be the one to establish illusion, and what would be established if everything were void?
Similarly, dreams are established in the state of wakefulness, which is true. If wakefulness were non-existent, then dreams would also be non-existent. Therefore, by accepting dreams, you must also accept the state of wakefulness, which follows them. By accepting this, the concept of universal voidness is negated. Dreams are not simply non-existent, because they are experienced and have real effects. As it is said:
"**Anuhuyadiṭṭhacintiya chāyapayaiviyāradevayā'ṇūyā. Sumina'ssa nimittā'ī puṇṇaṁ pāvaṁ ca ṇābhāvo. ||1||**" (Shadow - experienced, seen, thought, heard, nature, change, divine forms. The causes of dreams are merit and demerit, not non-existence. ||1||)
Magic, too, is established in the presence of truth. If it were non-existent, then who would establish magic for whom? The appearance of two moons in the night also occurs when there is a single moon, which is perceived as real. This is not possible if everything were void. Nor is there any absolute non-existence of anything. The non-existence of things like the horns of a rabbit, the hair of a tortoise, the lotus in the sky, etc., is well-known. This refers to the non-existence of the meaning of the whole, not the meaning of each individual word. For example, the rabbit exists, and the horn exists, but it is stated that the horn that is connected to the head of the rabbit does not exist. Thus, only the connection is negated, not the absolute non-existence of the object. This should be understood in other contexts as well.
Those who are ignorant of the truth, the **Tirthikas**, cling to the doctrine of inaction, even though action exists.
Those who are wise, however, understand the truth as it is. For example, those who have attained **Kevala Jnana**, the perfect knowledge, see all objects in the three worlds as clearly as a fruit in the palm of their hand. Those who have complete knowledge of the scriptures understand past and future events through the scriptures. Others, who are skilled in the eightfold means of knowing, understand the nature of the soul and other objects through the power of these means. As it is said:
**Commentary:** To refute the doctrine of universal voidness, the Sutrakar states: Just as a blind person from birth, or one who became blind after birth, cannot see objects like pots, cloths, etc., even when they are in the presence of light from a lamp, etc., similarly, those who believe in inaction cannot see the existence of pots, cloths, etc., and the actions of moving, shaking, etc. Why can't they see these things? Because their knowledge is covered by karmas like **Jnana Avaraniya**, etc.
The rising of the sun is known to everyone, from cowherds to women. The sun destroys all darkness and opens lotuses. It is observed rising every day, just as Devadatta and others move from one place to another. Similarly, the sun also moves from one place to another.