Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
This is similar to the study of Vaitaliya. Such a man is addressed and said, "O blind man! You who are devoid of the knowledge of action and inaction due to accepting only direct perception as evidence, become devoted to the Agamas declared by the omniscient. By accepting only direct perception as evidence, all conduct disappears, then what will be your own existence? Because by accepting only direct perception as evidence, even conduct like who is whose father, who is whose son, cannot stand. You who accept the philosophy stated by the non-omniscient! First of all, you are only a witness to the material that is in front of you, and even then you believe in the philosophy that accepts only direct perception as evidence. In such a situation, if you do not accept the Agamas declared by the omniscient, you will be devoid of the discrimination of action and inaction and become like a blind man. Or, O man of faith in other philosophies! Whether you are unskilled or skilled, or whether you are skilled or unskilled, you should have faith in the path of benefit and self-welfare obtained by the man who is the possessor of the philosophy of only direct perception and only knowledge. The meaning is that whether a man is skilled or unskilled, he should have faith in the beneficial and welfare-giving philosophy declared by the omniscient. Or, O one who does not see the past and the future! Become devoted to what the omniscient, who sees the past, present, future, and subtle objects, has declared. O one who does not see the unseen! O one who does not see the unskilled! You who follow the philosophy declared by the non-omniscient! Abandon your insistence and have faith in the path spoken by the omniscient. This is the meaning.
It is said, why does a being not have faith in the path spoken by the omniscient, which you are instructing in this way? Explaining the reason, the Agamkar says - the word 'hu' in this verse is used in the sense of a figure of speech. The man whose philosophy, right knowledge, is completely obstructed is called obstructed philosophy. Then the question arises, by whom has his knowledge been obstructed? Then the question arises, by whom has his knowledge been obstructed? Solving it, they say that the being whose knowledge is obstructed by the false philosophy, etc., and the self-created karmas of knowledge-obscuring, etc., from which he becomes deluded by attachment, does not have faith in the path spoken by the omniscient. Therefore, the Agamkar inspires him to have faith in that path.
Dukhi mohe puno puno, nivvindej silogpuyanam.
Evam sahitahipaase aye atule panehim sanjae. ||12||
Chhaya - Dukhi moham punah punar nivvindet shlokpujanam.
Evam sahitahipaseyed atmatulyan pranan sanjayat. ||
Anuvaad - Dukhayukt praani punah punah mohamudha banta hai. Sadhu apne shlok-kirti, stuti, puja-samman ka parityaag kar de. Gyan adi se yukt sanaytachari sadhu sabhi praniyom ko atmatuly-apne saman samjhe. ||
Tika - Punarapyupadeshantamaha - dukkham asatavedaniyamudayapraptam tatkaranam va dukkhayatiti dukkham tadasyastiti dukkhi san praani paunah punyena moham yati sadsadvivekaviklobhavati. Idamuktam bhavati - asatodayaad dukkhamanubhavannaton
187