Tattvarthasutra Hindi

SR No.: 008066
Original Sutra Author: Umaswati, Umaswami
Author: Sukhlal Sanghavi
Publisher: Parshwanath Vidyapith
Publication Year: 1976
Total Pages: 444
Language: Hindi
Classification: Book_Devnagari, Philosophy, Religion, Epistemology, Tattvartha Sutra, & Tattvarth
File Size: 9 MB

Page 150

पञ्चमोऽध्यायः
अजोवकाया धर्माधर्माकाशपुद्गलाः ॥१॥ द्रव्याणि जीवाश्च ॥२॥ नित्यावस्थितान्यरूपाणि ॥३॥ रूपिणः पुद्गलाः॥४॥ आऽऽकाशादेकद्रव्याणि ॥५॥ निष्क्रियाणि च ॥६॥ असङ्ख्येयाः प्रदेशा धर्माधर्मयोः ॥७॥ जीवस्य ॥८॥ आकाशस्यानन्ताः ॥९॥ सङ्ख्येयाऽसङ्ख्येयाश्च पुद्गलानाम् ॥ १०॥
१ स० रा० श्लो० मे इस एक सूत्र के स्थान पर द्रव्याणि व जीवाश्च ये
दो सूत्र है। सिद्धसेन कहते है-'कोई इस सूत्र को उपयुक्त प्रकार से दो सत्र बनाकर पढते है जो ठीक नही है।' अकलङ्क के सामने भी किसी ने शङ्का उठाई है-द्रव्याणि जीदाः ऐसा 'च' रहित एक सूत्र ही क्यो नही रखते ?' विद्यानन्द का कहना
है कि स्पष्ट प्रतिपत्ति के लिए ही दो सूत्र बनाए गए है। २. सिद्धसेन कहते है-'कोई इस सूत्र को तोड़कर नित्यावस्थितानि
एवं प्ररूपाणि ये दो सूत्र बनाते है।' नित्यावस्थितान्यरूपाणि पाठान्तर भी उन्होने वृत्ति मे दिया है। नित्यावस्थितान्यरूपीणि ऐसे एक और पाठ का भी उन्होने निदेश किया है । 'कोई नित्यपद को अवस्थित का विशेषण समझते है' ऐसा भी वे कहते है। इस सूत्र की व्याख्या के मतान्तरों के लिए मिद्धसेनीय वृत्ति द्रष्टव्य है । ३ देखे--विवेचन, पृ० ११५, टि० १ । ४. -धर्माधर्मकजीनाम्-स० रा० श्लो० । ५. स० रा० श्लो० में यह पृथक सूत्र नहीं है। सिद्धसेन ने पृथक् सत्र
रखने के कारण का स्पष्टीकरण किया है ।
- १२३ -

Translation AI Generated

Fifth Chapter
Ajo, complex of substances, righteousness, unrighteousness, space, and particles. 1. Substances and souls. 2. Eternally existing formless entities. 3. Formed particles. 4. Among the one substance, arising from space. 5. Also inactive entities. 6. Countless regions of righteousness and unrighteousness. 7. Of the soul. 8. Inexhaustible space. 9. Countable and uncountable particles. 10.
1. In the commentary of Siddhasena, he states that instead of this one verse, the two verses "substances and souls" should be taken. He argues that reading this verse broken into two parts is incorrect. Someone has similarly raised a doubt in front of Akalanka, asking why not maintain one verse without "and" for "substances and souls"? Vidyananda asserts that the two verses were created for clearer understanding. 2. Siddhasena notes that someone splits this verse into "eternally existing" and "and formed," creating two verses. He has also presented alternative readings regarding eternally existing formless entities in his commentary. He indicates another reading that cites them as "eternally existing formless entities." He also mentions that some consider the word "eternal" as an adjective for "existing." For differing interpretations of this verse, the commentary of the Siddhaseni is worthy of consideration. 3. See discussion, page 115, note 1. 4. -From the category of righteousness and unrighteousness- as per the commentary. 5. In commentary notes, this is not a separate verse. Siddhasena has clarified the reason for maintaining separate sections.