________________
Vida]
Gaṇadharavāda
: 127:
On the non-apprehension of Karman, if Isvara eto, were taken to be the creators of the manifold variations in the world, a number of difficulties would arise,
कम्मणिच्छंतो वा सुद्धं चिय जीवमीसराई वा ।
मण्णसि देहाईणं जं कत्तारं न सो जुत्तो ॥ ९३ ॥ (१६४१) उबगरणाभावाओ निचेट्टा - ऽमुत्तयाइओ वा वि । ईसरदेहारंभे वि तुल्लया वाऽणवत्था वा ॥ ९४ ॥ (१६४२)
Kammamanicchanto và suddham ciya jivamisarāim vā | Manņasi dèhātņam jam kattāram na so jutto. 93 (1641) Uvagaraṇābhāvão niccèṭṭhā'muttayāiö vā vi Isaradèhārambhè vi tullayā va'ṇavatthā vā. 94 (1642)
•
[ कर्मानिच्छन् वा शुद्धमेव जीवमीश्वरादिं वा ।
मन्यसे देहादीनां यं कर्तारं न स युक्तः ॥ ९३ ॥ (१६४१)
उपकरणाभावाद् निश्चेष्टा- मूर्ततादितो वापि ।
ईश्वर देहारम्भेऽपि तुल्यता वाऽनवस्था वा ॥ ९४ ॥ (१६४२)
Karmanicchan vä śuddhamèva jivamiśvarādim vă i Manyasè dèhādinām yam kartāram na sa yuktaḥ, 93 (1641)]
Upakaraṇabhāvād niścèṣṭā-'mūrtatādito vapi i Isvarade harambhè'pi tulyatā va'navastha vs. 94 (1642)]
Trans-93-94 Or, denying (the existence of) Karman, you might presume jiva itself-pure and simple-or Isvara etc:, to be the creator of (the objects like ) dèha etc. But that is not SO, since jiva is void of means (upakaraŋa), motion (cèstā), and form (mūrtatā). Even (in the case of) dèha etc. being accomplished by Iśvara etc, either the same difficulties would arise or there would be disorder.
(1641-1642)
Jain Education International
For Private Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
