Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Prajñāpanasūtra 824-828:
**824. [1]** "Bhagavan! Is a single *gandhacarī* (odor-enjoyer) considered *carī* (superior) or *acarī* (inferior) in comparison to another?" **[824-1 Pr.]** "Gautama! From the perspective of a single *gandhacarī*, it is sometimes *carī* and sometimes *acarī*." **[824-1 U.]** **[2]** "And so on, continuously up to the *vaimānika* (celestial beings)." **[824-2]**
**825. [1]** "Bhagavan! Are multiple *gandhacarī* considered *carī* or *acarī* in comparison to another?" **[825-1 Pr.]** "Gautama! From the perspective of multiple *gandhacarī*, they are both *carī* and *acarī*." **[825-1 U.]** **[2]** "And so on, continuously up to the *vaimānika*." **[825-2]**
**826. [1]** "Bhagavan! Is a single *rasacarī* (taste-enjoyer) considered *carī* or *acarī* in comparison to another?" **[826-1 Pr.]** "Gautama! From the perspective of a single *rasacarī*, it is sometimes *carī* and sometimes *acarī*." **[826-1 U.]** **[2]** "And so on, continuously up to the *vaimānika*." **[826-2]**
**827. [1]** "Bhagavan! Are multiple *rasacarī* considered *carī* or *acarī* in comparison to another?" **[827-1 Pr.]** "Gautama! From the perspective of multiple *rasacarī*, they are both *carī* and *acarī*." **[827-1 U.]** **[2]** "And so on, continuously up to the *vaimānika*." **[827-2]**
**828. [1]** "Bhagavan! Is a single *phāsacarī* (touch-enjoyer) considered *carī* or *acarī* in comparison to another?" **[828-1 Pr.]**