Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Translation:
[12] The **Prajñāpanā Sūtra** are considered **viśeṣādhika** (superior) when combined, because according to the aforementioned reasoning, the **lok** (world) has nine **carma-khaṇḍa** (extreme sections) and only one **acarma-khaṇḍa** (non-extreme section). Similarly, the **alok** (non-world) also has 13 **carma** and **acarma-khaṇḍa** combined. When these two are combined, they become twenty-two. This number twenty-two is not double, triple, or any multiple of twelve, hence it is **viśeṣādhika**.
From the perspective of **pradeśa** (regions), the **carma-anta-pradeśa** (extreme regions) of the **lok** are the least, because they are only **pāṭha** (sections). Compared to them, the **carma-anta-pradeśa** of the **alok** are **viśeṣādhika**. The **acarma-anta-pradeśa** (non-extreme regions) of the **lok** are **asamkhyāta-guṇa** (innumerable times) more than the **carma-anta-pradeśa** of the **alok**, because the **acarma** (non-extreme) region is much larger, and therefore its **pradeśa** are also much larger. Compared to them, the **acarma-anta-pradeśa** of the **alok** are **ananta-guṇa** (infinite times) more, because that region is infinite. Even compared to these, the **carma-anta-pradeśa** and **acarma-anta-pradeśa** of both **lok** and **alok** are **viśeṣādhika**, because even after combining the **carma-anta-pradeśa** of the **lok**, the **acarma-anta-pradeśa** of the **lok**, and the **carma-anta-pradeśa** of the **alok** within the **acarma-anta-pradeśa** of the **alok**, they all remain **asamkhyāta**. And **asamkhyāta** is less than **ananta** (infinite), therefore even after including them, they are still **viśeṣādhika** compared to the **acarma-anta-pradeśa** of the **alok**.
One should consider the **alpa-bahutva** (lesser and greater) of **dravya** (substance) and **pradeśa** based on the aforementioned reasoning. Compared to the **carma-khaṇḍa** of the **lok**, the **carma-khaṇḍa** of the **alok** are **viśeṣādhika**, and compared to them, the **acarma** of both **lok** and **alok**, along with their **carma-khaṇḍa**, are **viśeṣādhika**. The reason for this is the same as before. Compared to them, the **carma-anta-pradeśa** of the **lok** are **asamkhyāta-guṇa** more, and compared to them, the **carma-anta-pradeśa** of the **alok** are **viśeṣādhika**. Compared to them, the **acarma-anta-pradeśa** of the **lok** are **asamkhyāta-guṇa** more. Compared to them, the **acarma-anta-pradeśa** of the **alok** are **ananta-guṇa** more. This is the **yukti** (reasoning). Compared to them, the **carma-anta-pradeśa** and **acarma-anta-pradeśa** of both **lok** and **alok** combined are **viśeṣādhika**.
Compared to the **carma** and **acarma-pradeśa** of both **lok** and **alok**, all **dravya** combined are **viśeṣādhika**, because **ananta-ananta-samkhyaka** (infinitely infinite) **jīva** (living beings), **paramāṇu** (atoms), etc., and **ananta** (infinite) **paramāṇu-ātmaka** (atomic) **skandha** (aggregates) are all individually **ananta-ananta** (infinitely infinite), and they are all **dravya**. Compared to all **dravya**, all **pradeśa** are **ananta-guṇa** more, and compared to all **pradeśa**, all **paryāya** (categories) are **ananta-guṇa** more, because each **pradeśa** has **ananta** (infinite) **sva-para-paryāya** (self and other categories). This is all clear.
**The statement about the carma-acarma, etc., of paramāṇu-pudgala, etc.**
781. **Paramāṇu-pudgala** (atomic particles), **bhaṇte** (venerable sir)! What is **carime** (extreme) and **pracarime** (non-extreme) in their **pravattana** (activity)? Is **carimā** (extremeness) and **pracarimā** (non-extremeness) **avattāvya** (to be stated)?
**Udāhu** (for example), **carime** (extreme) and **pracarime** (non-extreme)? **Udāhu** (for example), **carime** (extreme) and **acarimā** (non-extremeness)? **Udāhu** (for example), **carimā** (extremeness) and **acarime** (non-extreme)? **Udāhu** (for example), **carimā** (extremeness) and **acarimā** (non-extremeness)?
**Pradhama** (first) **catuṣbhanga** (fourfold predication): **Udāhu** (for example), **carime** (extreme) and **avattāvya** (to be stated)? **Udāhu** (for example), **carime** (extreme) and **avattāvya** (to be stated)? **Udāhu** (for example), **carimā** (extremeness) and **pravattāvya** (to be active)? **Udāhu** (for example), **carimā** (extremeness) and **pravattāvya** (to be active)?
**Dvitīya** (second)