Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Translation:
**39.** [Prajnapana Sutra] In terms of *Prajnapana*, they are equal; in terms of *Paesatta*, they are equal; in terms of *Progahanatta*, they are *Chaturthanapatita*; in terms of *Thiti*, they are *Trithanapatita*; in terms of *Vanna*, *Gandha*, *Rasa*, and *Sparsa* *Paryayas*, they are *Shatthanapatita*; in terms of *Abhinibodhik* *Paryayas*, they are equal; in terms of *Suyanan* *Paryayas*, they are *Shatthanapatita*; in terms of *Prachakkhudasan* *Paryayas*, they are *Shatthanapatita*. [477-1 Pra.] Bhagavan! How many *Paryayas* are there for *Jghanya-Prabhinibodhik* *Jnani* *Dwiindriya* beings? [477-1 U.] Gautama! They have infinite *Paryayas*. [Pra.] Bhagavan! Why is it said that *Jghanya-Prabhinibodhik* *Jnani* *Dwiindriya* beings have infinite *Paryayas*? [U.] Gautama! One *Jghanya-Prabhinibodhik* *Jnani* *Dwiindriya* is equal to another *Jghanya-Prabhinibodhik* *Jnani* *Dwiindriya* in terms of *Dravya*; they are equal in terms of *Pradesha*; they are *Chaturthanapatita* in terms of *Avgahanana*; they are *Shatthanapatita* in terms of *Vanna*, *Gandha*, *Rasa*, and *Sparsa* *Paryayas*. They are equal in terms of *Abhinibodhik* *Paryayas*; they are *Shatthanapatita* in terms of *Shruta* *Paryayas*; and they are also *Shatthanapatita* in terms of *Achakkhudarshan* *Paryayas*. [2] Similarly, it is for *Ukkosa-Abhinibodhik* *Paryayas*. [477-2] In the same way, it should be said about the *Paryayas* of *Ukkosa-Abhinibodhik* *Jnani* *Dwiindriya* beings. [3] The statement about the *Paryayas* of *Madhyama-Abhinibodhik* *Jnani* *Dwiindriya* beings should also be made in the same way, but they are *Shatthanapatita* in their own *Sthana*. [477-3] 478. Similarly, it should be said about the *Paryayas* of *Shruta* *Jnani*, *Shruta-Ajnani*, *Mati-Ajnani*, and *Achakkhudarshani* *Dwiindriya* beings. The special thing is that where there is *Jnana*, there is no *Ajnanana*; where there is *Ajnanana*, there is no *Jnana*. Where there is *Darshan*, there can be both *Jnana* and *Ajnanana*. 476. Similarly, it should be said about *Triindriya* beings. [479] It has been said about the *Paryayas* of *Dwiindriya* beings from many perspectives; in the same way, it should be said about the *Paryayas* of *Triindriya* beings. 480. Similarly, it should be said about the *Paryayas* of *Charidriya* beings. The only difference is that their *Chakkhudarshan* is more. [480] (The rest is the same as for *Dwiindriya* beings.)