Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Translation:
**510]** The *maya-pratyaya* arises from the *prarabdhi* of one who has *prarabdhi*, but the *prarabdhi* of one who has *maya-pratyaya* may or may not arise. It does not arise for one who is *apramatta-samyata*, but it arises for the rest. Similarly, the *apratyakhyani-kriya* arises from the *prarabdhi-kriya* of one who has *prarabdhi-kriya*. This *kriya* does not arise for the *pramatta-samyata* and *desa-virata*, but it arises for those who are *avirata*, *samyag-drishti*, etc. The *prarabdhi-kriya* is inevitable for one who has *apratyakhyani-kriya*. The *mithya-darsana-kriya* arises from the *prarabdhi* of one who has *prarabdhi*, by way of *vikalpa*. It arises for the *artha-mithya-drishti*, but not for the rest. The *prarabdhi* is inevitable for one who has *mithya-darsana-kriya*, because the *mithya-drishti* is inevitably *avirata*. The *parigrahi-kriya* co-exists with the next three *kriyas*, the *maya-pratyaya* with the next two *kriyas*, and the *apratyakhyani-kriya* with the *mithya-darsana-pratyaya*. All five *kriyas* arise in the five *sthavara* and three *vikaleandri* because the *mithya-darsana-pratyaya* is inevitable in the *prithvi-kayika* etc. The *apratyakhyani-kriya* arises for the *avirata-samyag-drishti*, the *mithya-darsana-pratyaya* for the *mithya-drishti*, and all four *prarabdhi-kriyas* for the *desa-virata*.
**1637.** **[Question]** Venerable Sir, do the *jiva*s refrain from *pranatipata*? **[Answer]** Yes, they do. **[Question]** Venerable Sir, in what (object) does the *pranatipata-virama* occur? **[Answer]** Gautama! It occurs in the six *jiva-nikaya*s.
**1638.** **[1]** **[Question]** Venerable Sir, do the *nairyaika*s refrain from *pranatipata*? **[Answer]** Gautama! This meaning is not valid. **[2]** Similarly, one should understand the *pranatipata-virama* of the *vaimaniya*s, etc., up to the *manushya*s. It is special that the *pranatipata-virama* of the *manushya*s should be said to be like that of the (ordinary) *jiva*s (according to Sutra 1637).
**1669.** Similarly, the *pranatipata-virama* of the *musava*s, etc., up to the *maya-mosa*s, for both the *jiva* and the *manushya*, is not valid. However, the *virama* in the *adinn-adana*, *grahana-dharana*, *damva*, *mehu*na, *rupa*, or *rupa-saha-ga* *damva*s, is valid for the rest.
**1.** *Prajnapana*, *Malayavritti*, *patra* 448.