Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
[502] [Prajñāpanasūtra [1615 pr.] (Bhagavan! ) In which country does the bodily action of a living being occur, does the authoritative action occur in that country? [U.] (Here also) in the same way (as the previous sūtras) up to the Vaimānika (should be said / ) 1616. [1] Jumpasanam bhanta! Jivasas kaaya kiriya kajjati tam paesa praahigaraniya kiriya kajjati? Evam taheva java vemaniyassa. [1616-1 pr. (Bhagavan! ) In which province does the bodily action of a living being occur, does the authoritative action occur in that province? [U.] (Gautama! ) (Here also) in the same way (as the previous sūtras) up to the Vaimānika (should be said.) [2] Evam ete jassa 1, jam samayaṁ 2, jam desam 3, jam paesam ṇam 4 cattari danga honti / [1616-2] In this way (1) which living being (2) at what time (3) in which country and (4) in which province these four danda are. The consideration of the mutual coexistence of the actions of contemplation - the present 10 sūtras (su. 1607 to 1616) have considered the mutual coexistence of the aforementioned five actions, from the perspective of the living being, time, country and province. The conclusion is that the first three actions are regularly present in the living being, in the form of mutual coexistence, but the last two actions are sometimes present and sometimes not present with these first three actions / but in which living being the last two actions are present, the first three actions are definitely present / Prāṇātipāta and Pārītāpanika actions are sometimes present together in a living being, sometimes not / Like the ordinary living being, these are the same rules of coexistence of these actions in the twenty-four danda-warti living beings / In the living being, the country and province should be said to be the protectors of the action-coexistence relationship, like the grālapka of the action-coexistence relationship. Mutual coexistence of bodily etc.: by rule or by choice? The body also becomes a kind of authority, therefore, when the bodily action occurs, the authoritative action must occur, and when the authoritative action occurs, the bodily action must also occur. And that specific bodily action does not occur without hatred, therefore, there is an inseparable relationship of the bodily action with the hateful action / At the time of that action, the marks of hatred (curvature, roughness, hardness, etc.) on the body are clearly visible / Therefore, the hateful action is directly available with the bodily action / 2 When the coexistence of the first three actions occurs, then there is no rule of coexistence of both paritāpana and prāṇātipāta; because when someone draws a bow and arrow etc. to kill a deadly bound deer etc. 1. Pāṇavaṇasutta (original text-annotated) Bha. 1, p. 355-356 2. Prajñāpana. Malayavatti, p. 444-445