Vaisheshika Sutram

SR No.: 002759
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Jambuvijay
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra
Publication Year: 1961
Total Pages: 360
Language: Sanskrit, Hindi
Classification: Book_Devnagari, Ritual_text, & Ritual
File Size: 19 MB

Page 172

१०२
वैशेषिकसूत्रपाठतुलनात्मकं
१. १.
अत्र मुद्रितः सूत्रपाठः ।
अथातो धर्म व्याख्यास्यामः | १ | यतो ऽभ्युदय निःश्रेयस सिद्धिः स धर्मः | २ |
5 तद्वचनादाम्नायप्रामाण्यम् । ३ । पृथिव्यापस्तेजो वायुराकाशं कालो दिगात्मा मन इति द्रव्याणि । ४ । रूपरसगन्धस्पर्शाः सख्याः परिमाणानि पृथक्त्वं संयोगविभागौ परत्वापरत्वे बुद्धयः 10 सुखदुःखे इच्छाद्वेषौ प्रयत्नश्च गुणाः । ५ । उत्क्षेपणमवक्षेपण माकुञ्चनं प्रसारणं गमनमिति कर्माणि । ६ ।
सदनित्यं द्रव्यवत् कार्य कारणं सामान्यविशेषवदिति द्रव्यगुणकर्मणामविशेषः | ७ |
मि. वृत्त्यनुसारेण सम्भावितः सूत्रपाठः ।
१
१ ।
तद्वचनादाम्नायस्य प्रामाण्यम् । १ ।
। १ ।
१ । १ । २ ।
१ । ३ ।
१ । १ । ४ ।
• प्रयत्नाश्च गुणाः । १ । १ । ५ ।
१ । १ । ७ ।
15
The commentary gives the Sutra-text also. But the manuscript does not distinguish the sutras from the commentary. The commentary in its turn, generally does not give any introduction to, or a word for word explanation of, the sutras. Hence it was sometimes found very difficult to assertain the sutrapatha followed. The lacunae were also 20 formidable hurdles It is at times felt that some sutras have been covered by them iu the manuscript. Moreover, some sutras have only been referred to while many others are found untouched. The Sutrapatha in the present edition should not be regarded as the the exact version followed by our commentator. Thus we have not changed 25 'abhavas tamah 'into bha'bhavas tamah.' in V. ii. 19 though the commentary suggests it. The frequent use of brackets both in the Sutaras as well as in the commentary will show that we had to take liberty in many cases wherever the manuscript was found defective. Sometimes we thought ourselves fortunate as the word of words lost in the Sutratext were suggested by the commentary. In others, we had to follow S'aikara Mis'ra for want of & better authority. But no Sūtra has been accepted here the existence of which was not somehow suggested either by the commentary or by direct mention in the manuscript. - Introduction of the वैशेषिकदर्शन. p. 9.
30
१ । १ । ६ ।