Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
Translation preserving Jain terms:
Discourse on the Five Transgressions of the Vow of Brahmacharya (Celibacy)
Take the verse 93 from the third chapter of the Yogashastra. This should be done with the understanding that merely picking a lock or cutting a pocket is not the commonly known theft, but it is the art of trade. From this perspective, making efforts to protect the vow amounts to the aforementioned two transgressions. Or, by providing assistance to a thief to carry out the said five acts; though these are clearly forms of theft, yet they occur due to negligence. Transgressions, violations, or transgressions that occur due to ignorance or lack of understanding are called faults in conduct. It is not the case that these transgressions do not apply to the servants of the king, etc. The first two transgressions generally apply to the servants of the king, etc. Entering the prohibited territory of the enemy is the third transgression, which occurs when a feudal lord, government official, or one under the service of a master (king) assists the adversary (be it the king or anyone else) of his master. Alteration in measurement and counterfeiting are two separate transgressions. Even the king can be subjected to these transgressions if he causes alteration in the measurement of his treasury or counterfeits goods. Thus, these are the five transgressions of the vow of non-stealing (Asteya-Anuvrta).
Now, the five transgressions of the fourth vow (Brahmacharya-Anuvrta) are being explained. 1. Cohabitation with a kept woman (mistress) or a prostitute for a short period, 2. Cohabitation with a woman with whom marriage has not occurred, 3. Marriage with people other than one's own family members or dissatisfaction with one's own wife and marrying another woman without her consent driven by intense desire for sensual pleasures, 4. Intense desire for sexual play, and 5. Engaging in Ananga-krida (erotic play); these are the five transgressions of the vow of Brahmacharya.
Explanation: The more commonly known name of the vow of Brahmacharya is the vow of contentment with one's own wife and abstinence from other women. From this perspective, the five transgressions of this vow are explained - 1. Ittvarat-tagama - The word 'Ittvari' means one kept for a short period. Such a woman could be a prostitute or a mistress who goes to multiple men, or one who is kept on a salary or rent, or one who is kept as a concubine or a servant (Goli) by taking the responsibility of her maintenance. Cohabitation with such a woman is called Ittvarat-tagama. The man who keeps such a woman considers her his wife by his perception or imagination, so there is no violation of the vow of contentment with one's own wife, but due to the fact that she is actually another's woman, even if accepted for a short period, there is a violation of the vow. Thus, Ittvarat-tagama is the first transgression that is both a violation and non-violation. 2. Anatta-gama - 'Anatta' means one who is not taken in marriage, i.e., one who does not have a husband. She could be an unmarried girl, a widow, a prostitute, a promiscuous woman, or an abandoned noblewoman; cohabitation with such an unmarried woman is the second transgression. This transgression occurs due to lack of understanding, ignorance, or negligence, but the abstainer from other's wives does not incur these two transgressions because at that time the prostitute or girl or widow does not have a husband. Prostitutes or promiscuous women do not have a husband at all. And then he accepts her as his wife for a short time. The remaining transgressions apply to both. The five transgressions are worth knowing for the one observing the vow of contentment with one's own wife, but not worth practicing. Other Acharyas' view on this matter is that these two transgressions apply to both the aforementioned types of men; because if the one content with his own wife keeps a woman (prostitute, etc.) for a short time and enjoys her, he incurs the transgression, this is clear. But the abstainer from other's wives also incurs the transgression by cohabiting with a husbandless woman, because the prostitute, etc. is without a husband, and he keeps her as a woman for a short time, after which she goes to another, then she becomes the wife of another, from this perspective, as she is somewhat another's woman, there is a violation of the vow, and as she is actually not another's woman, there is no violation of the vow. In this way, the second transgression, which is both a violation and non-violation, applies to both the one content with his own wife and the abstainer from other's wives. 3. Parvivaaha - Marrying the children of others, apart from one's own son-daughter, etc., or out of the desire to obtain the fruit of giving away a daughter in marriage...