Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Sarvarthasiddhi
Here.
Patanjali Mahabhashya
Sarvarthasiddhi, the indication of the cause, and the mere occasion in begging, etc.
Even in the mere occasion, the designation of the cause and the agent is seen. From seeing. The indication of the cause should also be seen in the mere occasion. As long as. Just as the dung fire teaches. He would say, "The cause is the occasion," until then, he is confused. What is the purpose? From seeing in begging, etc. Even in begging, etc., it is seen that they live by begging, the dung fire teaches, etc. - He returns with wisdom. This man who is a spectator
...'He returns with wisdom. Thus, he becomes a former spectator. He sees.
This man who is a spectator, he sees. Just as clarified butter and oil are said to be mixed. Just as clarified butter and oil are said to be mixed. It is understood that they are one.
It is understood that they are one. The remainder of the sentence and the sentence itself are subject to the speaker. The remainder of the sentence and the sentence itself are subject to the speaker.
Ratnakarandaka - This is a famous text of the Digambara tradition. It explains the nature of Dharma and explains Dharma as Samyagdarshan, Samyagjnana and Samyakcharitra, and discusses these three jewels in five chapters, hence it is called Ratnakarandaka. But while expounding Samyakcharitra, it only mentions all the charitra and mainly elaborates on Vikalcharitra (Shravakaachar), hence it is also called Ratnakarandaka Shravakaachar. Generally, it is famous that it is the immortal work of Acharya Samantabhadra Swami, a famous Acharya of the Digambara tradition. All the ancient mentions found so far confirm this fact. Prabhachandra Acharya himself, who wrote a detailed Sanskrit commentary on it, also considers it to be the work of Swami Samantabhadra. As is evident from the Pushpika found at the end of each chapter. In such a situation, Ratnakarandaka must have been available to Acharya Pujyapada while writing Sarvarthasiddhi. Further, we present some such mentions of these two texts which help in making inferences about this subject. The mentions are as follows: 1. The nature of Vrata is expressed in Ratnakarandaka in these words:
'Abhimanshikrita Virativishayayogan Vratam Bhavati ||3, 30||' The same thing is expressed in Sarvarthasiddhi in these words:
'Vratam Abhisandhikrito Niyamaḥ. 7 11' Ratnakarandaka gives these five names for Anarthadanda - Papopadeśa, Hinsadaan, Apadhyan, Dushruti and Pramadacharya. These same five names are also seen in Sarvarthasiddhi. Not only this, an unprecedented similarity of words is also seen regarding some of their characteristics. For example -
'Tiryakleshavaanijyahi Saarambhapralambhanaadinaam.
Kathaprasangaprasavaḥ Smartavyaḥ Papopadeśaḥ ||' Ratna 3 || 'Tiryakaraleshavaanijyapraanivaadhakarambhaadishu Paapasamyuktam Vachanam Papopaveshaḥ. ' Sa. 7, 211
'Kshitisalilabahanapavanaram Bhavam Vipalam Vanaspati Chhevam.
Maranam Saaranam Api Cha Pramavaacharya Prabhashante ||' Ran 3, 341 'Prayojanam Antareṇ Vrukshaadi Chhevanabhumikuttanasalilasechanaaghavadyakarma Pramavaacharitam. ' Sarva. 211
See Ratnakarandaka Shravakaachar, edited by 40 Jugalkishoraji and published by Manikchandra Granthamala, Bombay, from page 5 to page 15. 2. Iti Prabhachandravirachitayaam Samantabhadra Swaamivirachitopasakaadhyavanatikaayaam Prathamah Parichhedaḥ.