Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
The Harivansha Purana mentions Padmavati Nagari and its connection to Shripurvat for learning Mantra-Tantra. Similar references abound, proving that Shripurvat became a renowned center for Mantra-Tantra and Siddhis around the 7th century. This fame led some Tibetan texts to claim that Lord Buddha established his Dharmachakra in Dhanayakataka (a city near Shripurvat) (Rahul Sankrityayan's Puratatva-Nibandhavli). Archaeological evidence unearthed at Shripurvat has been conclusively linked to Nagarjunikonda in the Guntur district of modern Andhra Pradesh. This hill is now locally known as Naharallavadu. In light of this historical evidence, there is no doubt that the author of the Harivansha Purana was aware of Shripurvat's fame and used it as a reference point for his own creation of a new Shripurvat in the form of this Purana. Just as the Chaityavada branch of Mahayana Buddhism and the Vajrayana tradition believed that the worship of Shripurvat granted fulfillment of desires, similarly, Jinesena stated in his work, "Those who read this Harivansha with devotion will achieve their desired aspirations with little effort and will also benefit from Dharma, Artha, and Moksha" (66, 46). The author himself considered the mere name of Jinendra to be a remedy for the afflictions caused by planets and other celestial bodies (66, 41) and believed that the worship of Singhavahiini (Ambadevi) would bring peace from all obstacles (66, 44).
Jainism has made a significant and profound contribution to Indian culture. However, the elements adopted from other parallel streams of this culture are equally important. There is a great need to connect these scattered links through research and investigation. For this task, the first and foremost requirement is the smooth publication of literature, as a vast amount of Jain literature remains unpublished and unknown. This is evident from a mere glance at the published catalogs of Jain libraries, especially those in Jaipur. Along with the publication of this ancient literature, there is a need for accurate translations into Hindi and other prevalent languages. It is gratifying to note that this work is being carried out in a planned manner by some Granthamalas, among which the Murtidevi Granthamala holds a special place. There is an urgent need for internal and comparative research from historical and cultural perspectives, especially for the published literature, particularly the Jain Puranas.
This book has been edited by Pandit Pannalalji based on five or six manuscripts and adorned with his translation. He has mentioned and hinted at many important aspects related to the book in his preface. Some points have been raised that require further consideration and verification. For example, he mentions the reference to the Vimalkrit Harivansha Purana or Charit in the Kuvalayamala, but he completely overlooks the passage that the editor of Kuvalayamala (Dr. Upadhye) has accepted in his edition. The reading "Harivarisan" instead of "Harivans" in that passage can lead to a different interpretation. He mentions the imitation of this work in the Padmapurana by Ravishenacharya and in the Mahapurana, but the level of verification and seriousness that is desirable for these important opinions is not found here. An attempt has been made to rectify some other points through the above discussion.
Along with this book, Pandit Pannalalji has rendered a great service to Jain literature by presenting editions and translations of three ancient Jain Puranas - Mahapurana, Padmapurana, and Harivansha Purana. All three editions have been presented in a much purer and more useful form than their previous editions, making them highly beneficial for both ordinary readers and researchers in this field. This is our hope.
- Hiralal Jain, A.N. Upadhye