Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Karika 24]
The concept of a deity as a form becomes a mere alternative; consequently, all worldly conduct is disrupted. (If it is said that the one who is one becomes transformed into various agents and actions, then it is not correct; because) the one who is one - completely alone and helpless - does not arise from itself. - Its origin and cause of birth, etc., are something else. Without the existence and cause of the other, it cannot transform itself into various agents and actions.
## Karika 25]
No duality arises in karma-phala, etc. - duality of karma, duality of fruit, and duality of the world do not exist. Duality of knowledge and ignorance, and duality of bondage and liberation do not exist. ||25|| (If the principle of complete non-duality is accepted) the pair of karma-duality - good and bad karma, the pair of fruit-duality - virtuous and sinful fruits, and the pair of world-duality - the place of experiencing fruits, this world and the next world - do not exist. (Similarly) the duality of knowledge and ignorance, and the duality of bondage and liberation do not exist. Accepting any of these dualities contradicts the absolute non-duality. And if one element of each pair is eliminated and only the other is accepted, then the elimination of the other element also becomes necessary; because without one, the other cannot exist, and in this way, all conduct is eliminated.
## Karika 26]
If the non-duality is established from the cause, etc., then there is a contradiction of duality. If the non-duality is established from the cause, then there is duality in the cause and the object. If the non-duality is established without the cause, then it is merely a matter of words, is it not? ||26||