Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
The text provides a detailed explanation on certain issues. On page 64, the first line and the subsequent phrase should be read as follows – according to this, there are five distinctions of the nature of thought. Subsequently, as per the first Nāvama (as mentioned in the commentary), there are two types: Deshaparikṣepī and Sarvaparikṣepī, and three distinctions under the fifth category of Shabdanaya, namely, Samabhiruḍha and Evambhūta.
On line 20: Understand the footnote regarding the word "Nāvama" as follows: The definitions of the two distinctions indicated by Sri Umasvati of Nāvama are as follows – when a single entity, such as a pot or cloth, is considered under a general name, it is referred to as Deshaparikṣepī Nāvama, and when the entire category of meaning derived from that name is considered in thought, it is called Sarvaparikṣepī Nāvama.
On page 72 [line 13]: Understand the footnote regarding the word "Nacha": In the sutra, among the three distinctions of Shabdanaya indicated by Sri Umasvati, the first distinction is contemporary, meaning that the nature of thought is...