Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
115
Please read the article on Kundakunda in Part 15, Section 6. Also, read the introduction to 'Bāhuḍ'.
The commentary on Śrutasaṅgraha by Āśādharaka was completed in the Vikram era 1582. That is also in the 20th century of Vikram. The same applies to the commentary of Tattvārtha and 'Pāhuḍ' as well as the 'Yaśastilaka'. I do not know about the subject of the other Śrutasaṅgraha.
Letter to Jugal Kishoreji
"I have answered some of your questions in a straightforward manner.
1. So far, if the Digambar manuscript is different from the Guruvāliyā, it is mostly found to have been created after the 12th century of Vikram, it is correct to say so. Among them, which one is the oldest and when it was made or by whom it was made, I cannot say anything at this time. There is no mention of the time of creation on most manuscripts, and it is also experienced that, in some way, some portion of the final beginning was also included earlier.
There are many inscriptions and eulogies related to Kundakunda and Umāsvāti. However, none are before me at this time. The collection of Jain inscriptions of Śravaṇa Beḍā is before me at this time, as is the 28th volume of Maṇekchand Granthamālā.| SR No. | 001074 |
| Book Title | Tattvartha sutra |
| Original Sutra Author | Umaswati, Umaswami |
| Author | Sukhlal Sanghavi |
| Publisher | Jain Sahitya Prakashan Mandir |
| Publication Year | 1977 |
| Total Pages | 667 |
| Language | Gujarati, Sanskrit |
| Classification | Book_Gujarati, Tattvartha Sutra, Philosophy, J000, J001, Tattvartha Sutra, & Tattvarth |
| File Size | 23 MB |