Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
13
After that, the vision also narrowed. However, I have primarily focused on the following aspects in this medium-level analytical methodology:
1. Without writing a translation or summary of any single text or following the viewpoint of any one particular sect, I have utilized the neutral perspective of whatever has been read and contemplated regarding Jain philosophy up to now in writing the analysis.
2. While maintaining a conventional definition suitable for the curiosity of college or university students and also for students learning in the traditional manner, it is necessary to simplify and differentiate that definition.
3. As far as appropriate, to discuss directly both as dialogue in sections and non-dialogue in the remaining part.
4. To keep the sutra text consistent in the analysis and that also accepted in the commentary. Wherever there are significant differences in meaning, to cite that distinct sutra and provide its interpretation in a footnote.
5. To conduct the analysis by taking one or several points that resonate well, structuring the presentation through subheadings so that if the subject is lengthy, the lesser vital parts can be given lesser emphasis.
6. Comparing the Jain definitions with non-Jain definitions only where it is widely accepted, ensuring that no major confusion arises in that context.
7. Regarding any one matter, when there are multiple interpretations, whether from the Shvetambara or Digambara or both, to determine how much to include and how much to exclude based on the closeness to the analytical sutras and discussions.