Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
The description is as follows: In the "Panchastikaya" and "Samayasara," an analysis similar to that of the "Tattvartha" is conducted regarding the concepts of Asava, Samvara, Bandha, etc. However, there is a difference between the two, which is that in the Tattvartha's description, the representation of practical experience is more drawn out compared to the definitive aspects. It contains all the truths related to each principle, along with descriptions of the conduct and rules of all types of ascetics, householder, and renouncer, which suggests the framework of Jainism. In contrast, the "Panchastikaya" and "Samayasara" do not present it this way. They focus on discussions of Astrap, Samvara, etc., in a definitive and dependent manner; unlike the Tattvartha, they do not describe the prevalent vows, rules, and conduct of Jain householders and ascetics.
The comparison of this Charitrami-Mamsa with the Yogadarshan is as interesting as the space available for it; however, that elaboration is a subject for independent writing, and there is no room for it here. Nevertheless, to attract the attention of scholars, trusting in their independent capacity for comparison, a brief list of points suitable for comparison is provided below: Tattvartha
Yogadarshan 1. Physical, speech, and mental 1. Karmashaya (2, 12). impurity manifested as Asava (6, 1).
2. Mental Asrava 2. Regarding the subject of Nirodha (8, 1).
that includes the activities of thought (1, 6).